Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      June 4, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      June 4, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      June 4, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      June 4, 2025

      Players aren’t buying Call of Duty’s “error” excuse for the ads Activision started forcing into the game’s menus recently

      June 4, 2025

      In Sam Altman’s world, the perfect AI would be “a very tiny model with superhuman reasoning capabilities” for any context

      June 4, 2025

      Sam Altman’s ouster from OpenAI was so dramatic that it’s apparently becoming a movie — Will we finally get the full story?

      June 4, 2025

      One of Microsoft’s biggest hardware partners joins its “bold strategy, Cotton” moment over upgrading to Windows 11, suggesting everyone just buys a Copilot+ PC

      June 4, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      LatAm’s First Databricks Champion at Perficient

      June 4, 2025
      Recent

      LatAm’s First Databricks Champion at Perficient

      June 4, 2025

      Beyond AEM: How Adobe Sensei Powers the Full Enterprise Experience

      June 4, 2025

      Simplify Negative Relation Queries with Laravel’s whereDoesntHaveRelation Methods

      June 4, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Players aren’t buying Call of Duty’s “error” excuse for the ads Activision started forcing into the game’s menus recently

      June 4, 2025
      Recent

      Players aren’t buying Call of Duty’s “error” excuse for the ads Activision started forcing into the game’s menus recently

      June 4, 2025

      In Sam Altman’s world, the perfect AI would be “a very tiny model with superhuman reasoning capabilities” for any context

      June 4, 2025

      Sam Altman’s ouster from OpenAI was so dramatic that it’s apparently becoming a movie — Will we finally get the full story?

      June 4, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Tech & Work»How to Upskill Software Engineering Teams in the Age of AI

    How to Upskill Software Engineering Teams in the Age of AI

    June 2, 2025

    According to a recent survey, 40% of software engineering managers anticipate that AI will drastically change the skills needed to be a successful software engineer within the next three years. Unsurprisingly, the widespread adoption of AI code assistants and other Generative AI (GenAI) tools is transforming how organizations develop technical talent and how new software engineers learn their craft. 

    The challenge lies not just in learning to code — it’s in learning to code effectively in an AI-augmented environment. Software engineering teams becoming truly proficient with AI tools requires a level of expertise that can be hindered by premature or excessive reliance on the very tools in question. This is the “skills-experience paradox”: junior engineers must simultaneously develop foundational programming competencies while working with AI tools that can mask or bypass the very concepts they need to master. 

    To address these new challenges, software engineering leaders must evolve their talent development strategies to create effective learning environments that balance AI tool adoption with fundamental skills development.

    Software Engineering Leaders Must Lean on Structured Learning Pathways

    The solution for software engineering leaders lies in structured learning pathways that combine fundamental skills development with staged AI tool integration, demonstrating how strong foundational skills enable more sophisticated AI-augmented software engineering. These pathways should integrate three key learning approaches spanning formal learning, social learning and on the job learning:

    • Formal learning consists of targeted microlearning modules that cover fundamental concepts and AI tool capabilities, delivered just-in-time for practical application. 
    • Social learning is facilitated through communities of practice, where junior developers share experiences with AI tools, build prompt libraries, and learn from the decision-making processes of senior developers. 
    • On-the-job learning involves hands-on projects that progressively integrate AI tools, beginning with basic tasks like code completion and advancing to complex scenarios such as architecture pattern generation.

    Structured learning pathways must be strategically embedded within actual development work, not treated as separate training tracks. This means carefully mapping learning activities to the specific technical challenges and deliverables junior developers will encounter in their assigned projects. For example, if a junior developer is tasked with building a new API endpoint, their learning pathway should combine:

    • Formal learning on topics, such as API design principles and security, timed precisely when they need this knowledge.
    • Paired programming sessions with senior developers to build an understanding of how to effectively leverage AI tools in software development.
    • Hands-on experience applying these concepts while delivering actual business value.

    Software engineering leaders should introduce mentorship programs that explicitly address negative expertise, encouraging open discussion of when and how to effectively leverage or disregard AI assistance. And they should create structured learning pathways that combine rigorous fundamentals with staged access to AI tools, clearly defining appropriate use cases and limitations at each career stage.

    The AI Proficiency Divide

    The integration of GenAI into software engineering is also creating a widening gap between developers who effectively leverage these tools and those who struggle to integrate them appropriately. 

    According to recent surveys, only 29% of software development team members are satisfied or extremely satisfied with the overall experience of using AI tools/technologies. Additionally, 13% of software development team members report no productivity gains from using AI tools, while 39% report modest productivity increases of up to 10%. This disparity suggests that mere access to AI tools does not guarantee their effective use.

    Effective AI tool use requires shifting focus from productivity metrics to learning outcomes. This aligns with current trends — while professional developers primarily view AI tools as productivity enhancers, early-career developers focus more on their potential as learning aids. To avoid discouraging adoption, leaders should emphasize how these tools can accelerate learning and deepen understanding of software engineering principles. 

    To do this, they should first frame AI tools explicitly as learning aids in new developer onboarding and existing developer training programs, highlighting specific use cases where they can enhance the understanding of complex systems and architectural patterns. Then, they should implement regular feedback mechanisms to understand how developers are using AI tools and what barriers they face in adopting them effectively.

    Evolving Skills Assessment in AI-Augmented Development

    As the software engineering landscape evolves, a corresponding evolution in how talent is assessed and developed is required. With traditional code syntax and implementation skills increasingly automated by AI tools, organizations must evolve their approach to better evaluate both fundamental technical competencies and higher-level thinking skills.

    The key is to create opportunities for dialogue that reveal how candidates think about problems, not just how they code solutions. Instead of treating coding exercises as pass/fail tests, they become launching points for deeper discussions about software engineering principles, system design and problem-solving strategies. This provides a more complete picture of a candidate’s capabilities while better reflecting the realities of AI-augmented development work. 

    This evolved assessment approach isn’t just for hiring — it’s equally valuable for developing existing talent. Leaders should implement continuous learning frameworks that connect initial technical assessment results to personalized development paths, focusing on both fundamental engineering principles and effective AI tool integration. This continuous assessment and learning approach ensures development paths remain relevant as both technology and individual capabilities evolve.

    Further insights into application innovation and software engineering strategies will be discussed at the Gartner Application Innovation & Business Solutions Summits taking place June 3-5 in Las Vegas. Follow news and updates from the conferences on X using #GartnerAPPS.

     

    The post How to Upskill Software Engineering Teams in the Age of AI appeared first on SD Times.

    Source: Read More 

    news
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleTempoMail — Command Line Temporary Email in Linux
    Next Article Plotly brings vibe coding to visual data app development

    Related Posts

    Tech & Work

    Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

    June 4, 2025
    Tech & Work

    The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

    June 4, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    Top 100 Most Creative and Unique Portfolio Websites of 2024

    Development

    How AI coding agents could destroy open source software

    News & Updates

    CVE-2023-4533 – Red Hat OpenShift Remote Code Execution

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Microsoft Edge Android tests a big update with tab declutter, AI autofill and more

    Operating Systems

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-47256 – Libxmp Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

    May 6, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-47256

    Published : May 6, 2025, 8:15 p.m. | 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

    Description : Libxmp through 4.6.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in depack_pha in loaders/prowizard/pha.c via a malformed Pha format tracker module in a .mod file.

    Severity: 5.6 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    Critical Commvault RCE Vulnerability Lets Remote Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

    April 24, 2025

    CVE-2025-4217 – WordPress YouTube Video Optimizer Stored Cross-Site Scripting

    May 21, 2025

    Securing CI/CD workflows with Wazuh

    May 21, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.