Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      CodeSOD: Functionally, a Date

      September 16, 2025

      Creating Elastic And Bounce Effects With Expressive Animator

      September 16, 2025

      Microsoft shares Insiders preview of Visual Studio 2026

      September 16, 2025

      From Data To Decisions: UX Strategies For Real-Time Dashboards

      September 13, 2025

      DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 1139

      September 14, 2025

      Building personal apps with open source and AI

      September 12, 2025

      What Can We Actually Do With corner-shape?

      September 12, 2025

      Craft, Clarity, and Care: The Story and Work of Mengchu Yao

      September 12, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Can I use React Server Components (RSCs) today?

      September 16, 2025
      Recent

      Can I use React Server Components (RSCs) today?

      September 16, 2025

      Perficient Named among Notable Providers in Forrester’s Q3 2025 Commerce Services Landscape

      September 16, 2025

      Sarah McDowell Helps Clients Build a Strong AI Foundation Through Salesforce

      September 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      I Ran Local LLMs on My Android Phone

      September 16, 2025
      Recent

      I Ran Local LLMs on My Android Phone

      September 16, 2025

      DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 1139

      September 14, 2025

      sudo vs sudo-rs: What You Need to Know About the Rust Takeover of Classic Sudo Command

      September 14, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Machine Learning»Do LLMs Know Internally When They Follow Instructions?

    Do LLMs Know Internally When They Follow Instructions?

    April 10, 2025

    Instruction-following is crucial for building AI agents with large language models (LLMs), as these models must adhere strictly to user-provided constraints and guidelines. However, LLMs often fail to follow even simple and clear instructions. To improve instruction-following behavior and prevent undesirable outputs, a deeper understanding of how LLMs’ internal states relate to these outcomes is required. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs encode information in their representations that correlates with instruction-following success—a property we term “knowing internally”. Our analysis…

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleThis AI Paper Introduces a Machine Learning Framework to Estimate the Inference Budget for Self-Consistency and GenRMs (Generative Reward Models)
    Next Article Adaptive Batch Size for Privately Finding Second-order Stationary Points

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    How to Evaluate Jailbreak Methods: A Case Study with the StrongREJECT Benchmark

    September 3, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Announcing the new cluster creation experience for Amazon SageMaker HyperPod

    September 3, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Distribuzioni GNU/Linux: 5 tra le più insolite e originali!

    Linux

    Reddit Users Secretly Manipulated by AI in Shocking Psychological Experiment

    Artificial Intelligence

    CVE-2024-26009 – Fortinet FortiOS Authentication Bypass via FGFM Requests

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Vendor Access Policy

    News & Updates

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-49133 – Libtpms TPM 2.0 OOB Read Vulnerability

    June 10, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-49133

    Published : June 10, 2025, 8:15 p.m. | 1 hour, 33 minutes ago

    Description : Libtpms is a library that targets the integration of TPM functionality into hypervisors, primarily into Qemu. Libtpms, which is derived from the TPM 2.0 reference implementation code published by the Trusted Computing Group, is prone to a potential out of bounds (OOB) read vulnerability. The vulnerability occurs in the ‘CryptHmacSign’ function with an inconsistent pairing of the signKey and signScheme parameters, where the signKey is ALG_KEYEDHASH key and inScheme is an ECC or RSA scheme. The reported vulnerability is in the ‘CryptHmacSign’ function, which is defined in the “Part 4: Supporting Routines – Code” document, section “7.151 – /tpm/src/crypt/CryptUtil.c “. This vulnerability can be triggered from user-mode applications by sending malicious commands to a TPM 2.0/vTPM (swtpm) whose firmware is based on an affected TCG reference implementation. The effect on libtpms is that it will cause an abort due to the detection of the out-of-bounds access, thus for example making a vTPM (swtpm) unavailable to a VM. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.7.12, 0.8.10, 0.9.7, and 0.10.1.

    Severity: 5.9 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CVE-2025-2413 – Akinsoft ProKuafor Authentication Bypass Through Excessive Authentication Attempts

    September 2, 2025

    CVE-2025-8831 – Linksys Wireless Router Remote Management Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

    August 11, 2025

    The Ruby That Sang the Sky

    June 17, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.