Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      June 2, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      June 2, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      June 2, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      June 2, 2025

      How Red Hat just quietly, radically transformed enterprise server Linux

      June 2, 2025

      OpenAI wants ChatGPT to be your ‘super assistant’ – what that means

      June 2, 2025

      The best Linux VPNs of 2025: Expert tested and reviewed

      June 2, 2025

      One of my favorite gaming PCs is 60% off right now

      June 2, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      `document.currentScript` is more useful than I thought.

      June 2, 2025
      Recent

      `document.currentScript` is more useful than I thought.

      June 2, 2025

      Adobe Sensei and GenAI in Practice for Enterprise CMS

      June 2, 2025

      Over The Air Updates for React Native Apps

      June 2, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      You can now open ChatGPT on Windows 11 with Win+C (if you change the Settings)

      June 2, 2025
      Recent

      You can now open ChatGPT on Windows 11 with Win+C (if you change the Settings)

      June 2, 2025

      Microsoft says Copilot can use location to change Outlook’s UI on Android

      June 2, 2025

      TempoMail — Command Line Temporary Email in Linux

      June 2, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Machine Learning»TimeDP: A Multi-Domain Time Series Diffusion Model with Domain Prompts

    TimeDP: A Multi-Domain Time Series Diffusion Model with Domain Prompts

    January 15, 2025

    Generating time series data is important for many applications, including data augmentation, synthetic datasets, and scenarios. However, when there is more than one, this process becomes too complex because it includes variations of patterns across categories in the real world. With such wide variations in patterns among real-world categories, the complexity of the process tends to increase. The process especially becomes complicated because the data may not rely on historical records. It often falls apart in attempts to use natural language to describe domains when such descriptions are typically vague, incomplete, or impractical, especially for new or evolving areas. 

    Current time series generation methods employ models like GANs VAEs and mixed approaches like flows and ODEs. GANs are designed to optimize temporal dynamics, while VAEs focus on trend and seasonal decomposition using specialized decoders. Mixed methods attempt to unify diverse techniques but often fail to scale across multiple domains. Diffusion models like DDPMs generate data by reversing noise processes but mainly focus on single-domain settings. Multi-domain approaches rely on pretraining models on large datasets or normalizing data. However, they do not explicitly address the differences between domains and thus are less effective in handling diverse and evolving real-world challenges.

    To tackle the challenge of generating time series from multiple domains while preserving the model’s ability to differentiate between them, researchers from Nanjing University, Microsoft Research Asia, and Peking University introduced a novel multi-domain time series diffusion model, TimeDP. This model utilizes time series semantic prototypes to define the basis of the time series, where each prototype vector represents an elementary time series feature. The model extracts domain-specific prototype weights by employing a prototype assignment module, which helps learn domain prompts as generation conditions. During the sampling process, domain prompts are generated using few-shot samples from the target domain. This ensures that the generated time series has the characteristics of the specific domain.

    The researchers applied a training strategy that involved data from several domains. The strategy used conditional denoising and prototype assignment as the guiding process of generation. The model captured a diverse distribution of time series data by leveraging data from multiple domains. The model generated a time series for a selected domain by conditioning on domain-specific prototype assignments and using domain prompts. Furthermore, the approach supported generating time series from unseen domains by utilizing prototypes as a universal representation, enabling the model to generalize beyond the training data.

    Researchers evaluated 12 datasets across four domains: Electricity, Solar, Wind (energy), Traffic, Taxi, Pedestrian (transport), Air Quality, Temperature, Rain (nature), and NN5, Fred-MD, Exchange (economic). The datasets were pre-processed into uni-variate sequences of 24, 96, 168, and 336. Using a multi-domain dataset, they compared their model with baselines like TimeGAN, GT-GAN, TimeVAE, and TimeVQVAE. Results showed that the proposed model outperformed others in generating time series closest to real data, with the best performance on MMD, K-L, and MDD. It surpassed the class-conditional TimeVQVAE and other baselines, demonstrating better generation quality and strong representation disentanglement without using class labels.

    Hostinger

    In conclusion, the proposed TimeDP model effectively tackles multi-domain time series generation by using domain prompts and prototypes. It outperforms existing methods, offering better in-domain quality and strong performance on unseen domains. This approach sets a new benchmark for time series generation and can serve as a basis for future research, particularly in prototype-based learning and domain adaptation. Future work could improve scalability and explore its use in more complex applications.


    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and join our Telegram Channel and LinkedIn Group. Don’t Forget to join our 65k+ ML SubReddit.

    🚨 Recommend Open-Source Platform: Parlant is a framework that transforms how AI agents make decisions in customer-facing scenarios. (Promoted)

    The post TimeDP: A Multi-Domain Time Series Diffusion Model with Domain Prompts appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleEfficient Blockchain State Management with Quick Merkle Database (QMDB)
    Next Article Enhancing Language Model Performance and Diversity Through Multiagent Fine-Tuning

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    How to Evaluate Jailbreak Methods: A Case Study with the StrongREJECT Benchmark

    June 2, 2025
    Machine Learning

    MiMo-VL-7B: A Powerful Vision-Language Model to Enhance General Visual Understanding and Multimodal Reasoning

    June 2, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    CSS Frameworks List and Their Pros and Cons

    Development

    CVE-2025-4032 – InclusionAI AWorld Os Command Injection Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-4146 – Netgear EX6200 Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    AI in your AirPods: 3 big upgrades Apple Intelligence brings to these models

    Development

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-44860 – TOTOLINK CA300-POE Command Injection Vulnerability

    May 1, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-44860

    Published : May 1, 2025, 6:15 p.m. | 1 hour, 11 minutes ago

    Description : TOTOLINK CA300-POE V6.2c.884_B20180522 was found to contain a command injection vulnerability in the msg_process function via the Port parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted request.

    Severity: 0.0 | NA

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    How to Boot Ubuntu 24.04 into Rescue Mode

    June 13, 2024

    How to Use Speech AI for Healthcare Market Research

    May 25, 2024

    Fine-Tuning Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for Python Code: A Comprehensive Guide with Unsloth

    February 4, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.