Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 16, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 16, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 16, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025

      Minecraft licensing robbed us of this controversial NFL schedule release video

      May 16, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025

      Simplify Factory Associations with Laravel’s UseFactory Attribute

      May 16, 2025

      This Week in Laravel: React Native, PhpStorm Junie, and more

      May 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Characterizing and Mitigating Compute Express Link (CXL) Interference in Modern Memory Systems

    Characterizing and Mitigating Compute Express Link (CXL) Interference in Modern Memory Systems

    December 3, 2024

    Compute Express Link (CXL) emerges as an innovative technological solution addressing critical memory wall challenges in modern computing infrastructures. The interconnect technology presents a comprehensive approach to overcoming existing memory architecture limitations, offering high bandwidth density and a standardized interface for memory expansion and pooling. CXL’s innovative design has attracted substantial attention from both industrial and academic domains, signaling its potential to transform data center architectures fundamentally. Major technology leaders, including Intel, Samsung, and SK Hynix, are actively exploring and implementing CXL technologies. The technology’s significance extends beyond mere incremental improvements, promising to revolutionize how computational systems manage and utilize memory resources in increasingly complex computing environments.

    Despite CXL’s promising technological framework, the technology confronts significant performance challenges arising from external interference within server architectures. The interconnect technology faces potential performance threats from complex interactions between Main Memory (MMEM) and neighboring storage components, which current research has not comprehensively examined. Maintaining performance isolation becomes critical, especially for applications with stringent performance requirements. Existing research, such as the MT2 study, has attempted to explore interference between persistent memory and DRAM by identifying noisy neighbors and mitigating memory traffic disruptions. However, CXL-specific interference mechanisms remain largely understudied. Current simulation approaches typically introduce delay factors manually, failing to accurately reflect real-world operational environments and the nuanced interactions between different computational components.

    Researchers from Tsinghua University, the Institute of Computing Technology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Alibaba Group, and  Zhejiang University developed CXL-Interference, a comprehensive methodology to systematically characterize and analyze potential interference mechanisms between memory and storage systems in CXL architectures. The study employed configurable microbenchmarks and real-world applications across two distinct CXL hardware configurations to identify and explore interference conditions. By conducting detailed evaluations using kernel functions and hardware performance counters, the research team investigated interference scenarios across multiple application domains, including file systems, databases, machine learning, large language models, in-memory databases, and graph computing. Importantly, the study pioneered the first real-device investigation of CXL interference, demonstrating a novel approach to understanding complex computational interactions. The research successfully explored software and hardware intervention strategies, ultimately developing solutions to restore memory bandwidth to 99% of its original performance levels.

    CXL, developed in 2019, represents a robust and unique open standard interconnect designed to enhance data-centric application performance through high-speed, low-latency communication between computational components. The technology’s protocol stack comprises three critical elements: CXL.io, CXL.cache, and CXL.mem, each facilitating distinct data transmission and memory access mechanisms. CXL devices are categorized into three types, with varying capabilities ranging from communication facilitation to memory resource sharing and expansion. These devices can be implemented using FPGA or ASIC technologies, with vendors like Intel, Samsung, Montage, and Micron actively developing innovative solutions. The technology addresses fundamental limitations in traditional memory systems, particularly the constrained capacity and bandwidth of conventional DRAM, by offering sophisticated memory pooling and expansion capabilities.

    The research team established comprehensive microbenchmarks to systematically evaluate CXL interference across multiple memory and storage operations. The experimental setup involved cross-evaluating three memory-related operations (load, store, and non-temporal store) and two storage-related operations (random-read and random-write). Researchers meticulously controlled experimental conditions by disabling hyperthreading, locking CPU frequency, and clearing the cache before each test. Experiments allocated main and interfering processes to separate cores within the same NUMA node, ensuring precise measurement accuracy. Multiple test iterations were conducted to obtain statistically reliable average results. The microbenchmark design allowed for a detailed exploration of interference mechanisms between CXL, MMEM, and storage systems, providing nuanced insights into performance interactions across different computational configurations.

    The research investigation explored interference scenarios across four distinct application types, systematically categorizing them into Type A through Type D. These categories encompassed filesystem-related applications under CXL traffic, CXL-related applications under SSD traffic, MMEM-related applications under CXL traffic, and CXL-related applications under MMEM traffic. Researchers selected a diverse range of applications with varied computational characteristics to comprehensively analyze interference mechanisms. The study meticulously documented performance impacts across different scenarios. The analysis revealed consistent contention and interference patterns across multiple access types and system configurations, highlighting the complex interdependencies between computational components in modern server architectures.

    As CXL technology transitions from theoretical concepts to commercially available devices, researchers recognize the critical need to examine these components beyond isolated characterizations. The study reveals significant performance implications when CXL devices interact with other system components, demonstrating potential performance drops of up to 93.2% under specific interference scenarios. By systematically investigating the root causes of these performance disruptions, the research not only highlights the complex interactions within modern computational architectures but also proposes targeted mechanisms to manage CXL traffic. The comprehensive evaluation provides crucial insights into the technological challenges and potential mitigation strategies for emerging memory and interconnect technologies, offering a nuanced understanding of the performance trade-offs inherent in next-generation computing infrastructures.


    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and join our Telegram Channel and LinkedIn Group. If you like our work, you will love our newsletter.. Don’t Forget to join our 60k+ ML SubReddit.

    🎙 🚨 ‘Evaluation of Large Language Model Vulnerabilities: A Comparative Analysis of Red Teaming Techniques’ Read the Full Report (Promoted)

    The post Characterizing and Mitigating Compute Express Link (CXL) Interference in Modern Memory Systems appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Hostinger
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleGoogle AI and UNC Chapel Hill Researchers Introduce REVTINK: An AI Framework for Integrating Backward Reasoning into Large Language Models for Improved Performance and Efficiency
    Next Article Balancing Privacy and Robustness in NLP: A New Approach for Secure Prompt Learning in LLMs

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    Salesforce AI Releases BLIP3-o: A Fully Open-Source Unified Multimodal Model Built with CLIP Embeddings and Flow Matching for Image Understanding and Generation

    May 16, 2025
    Security

    Nmap 7.96 Launches with Lightning-Fast DNS and 612 Scripts

    May 16, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    When and How to Go Off-Grid in Design

    Development

    CVE-2025-26382 – iSTAR ICU Buffer Overflow

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    MIT Researchers Use Deep Learning to Get a Better Picture of the Atmospheric Layer Closest to Earth’s Surface: Improving Weather and Drought Prediction

    Development

    Windows 7 would boot much slower if you used specific wallpapers — A veteran Microsoft engineer links the bug to a “simple programming error”

    News & Updates

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-4458 – Code-projects Patient Record Management System SQL Injection Vulnerability

    May 9, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-4458

    Published : May 9, 2025, 4:16 a.m. | 2 hours, 24 minutes ago

    Description : A vulnerability was found in code-projects Patient Record Management System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /edit_upatient.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

    Severity: 6.3 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CVE-2025-32984 – NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

    April 25, 2025

    Top 10 Best Social Media Plugins for WordPress in 2024

    November 26, 2024

    The smartwatch I recommend to first-timers is not by Apple or Samsung (And it’s only $229)

    August 1, 2024
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.