Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 18, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 18, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 18, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 18, 2025

      I need to see more from Lenovo’s most affordable gaming desktop, because this isn’t good enough

      May 18, 2025

      Gears of War: Reloaded — Release date, price, and everything you need to know

      May 18, 2025

      I’ve been using the Logitech MX Master 3S’ gaming-influenced alternative, and it could be your next mouse

      May 18, 2025

      Your Android devices are getting several upgrades for free – including a big one for Auto

      May 18, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      YTConverter™ lets you download YouTube videos/audio cleanly via terminal — especially great for Termux users.

      May 18, 2025
      Recent

      YTConverter™ lets you download YouTube videos/audio cleanly via terminal — especially great for Termux users.

      May 18, 2025

      NodeSource N|Solid Runtime Release – May 2025: Performance, Stability & the Final Update for v18

      May 17, 2025

      Big Changes at Meteor Software: Our Next Chapter

      May 17, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      I need to see more from Lenovo’s most affordable gaming desktop, because this isn’t good enough

      May 18, 2025
      Recent

      I need to see more from Lenovo’s most affordable gaming desktop, because this isn’t good enough

      May 18, 2025

      Gears of War: Reloaded — Release date, price, and everything you need to know

      May 18, 2025

      I’ve been using the Logitech MX Master 3S’ gaming-influenced alternative, and it could be your next mouse

      May 18, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Artificial Intelligence»Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    November 21, 2024

    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    In 2024, the benefits of integrating AI into business processes and products is clear—but the route to that integration is not quite as straightforward. Despite an undeniable eagerness to integrate, organizations are forced to answer one critical question before they can—build in-house, on open-source tools, or with AI providers?

    Each path has a unique set of benefits and drawbacks, and it’s essential to understand what those are in order to make the best decision for your business and goals. A wrong route is no small setback and can result in major delays, resourcing constraints, and financial burdens.

    We surveyed more than 200 tech founders to find out what the primary barriers to AI integration are and what their teams are doing to work around them.

    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    Barriers to AI integration

    Despite widespread interest in AI, many organizations struggle to implement it effectively due to 5 primary barriers.

    Technical Complexity

    Building AI systems requires advanced expertise in machine learning, data engineering, and infrastructure management. For organizations without these skill sets, the learning curve can be overwhelming. Our report indicated that 49% of leaders cited the learning curve as a top challenge when considering open-source or in-house options.

    Team Bandwidth

    On average, 52% of our respondents reported insufficient team capacity as a major barrier. Developing AI solutions in-house requires substantial time commitments from initial integration to ongoing operations and updates. Many organizations find their teams stretched thin, making it difficult to dedicate the appropriate amount of energy to the rigorous demands of AI development and deployment.

    Cost

    AI projects demand substantial investment—not just in the technology but also in the talent. Integrating AI requires top-tier talent, plus additional resources allocated for infrastructure, ongoing model maintenance, security best practices and more. Many companies underestimate the costs of building or scaling AI systems, leading to budget overruns and unmet expectations.

    Speed of iteration

    Moving quickly means always having dedicated hands on deck. When engineering and development teams are responsible for both developing and maintaining custom AI along with designing and building the customer-facing tools and features, the question of whether or not they’ll be able to move fast enough becomes a big one.

    Data security, privacy, and compliance

    Organizations must ensure that sensitive data, such as financial or medical information, is properly secured and stored. This includes implementing encryption protocols and deciding whether customer data will be used for training models. Legal and regulatory concerns, such as GDPR or HIPAA, must also be addressed. Businesses need a clear plan for meeting these requirements and maintaining compliance with relevant laws. Ongoing monitoring and support are necessary to adapt to changing regulations and safeguard against security risks.

    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    In-House, Open Source, or AI Provider?

    Building from the ground up can be tempting—it lends itself to pure control and customization—however, as many industry leaders are learning, it’s not a temptation that comes without complexity. Businesses are limited to their own capabilities and are quite often caught off guard by the unforeseen complications, questions, and costs that accompany in-house and open-source builds.

    Building In-House

    While this DIY approach can yield expert solutions tailored to hyper-specific needs, it is resource intensive and risky.

    • Pros:
      • Full control over the AI model and data, but only if your expertise allows
      • Custom solutions optimized for niche use cases
    • Cons:
      • Requires significant investment in hiring AI talent and infrastructure
      • Long development timelines and unforeseen deployment delays

    Open-source

    Open-source frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch offer a middle ground, enabling teams to build AI systems without starting from scratch. These tools are free and widely supported by developer communities.

    • Pros:
      • Cost-effective and flexible
      • Access to pre-built models and shared innovations
    • Cons:
      • Limited support for scaling beyond prototypes
      • Ongoing maintenance and expertise are still required
      • Less customization options

    Partnering with AI Providers

    AI providers deliver cutting-edge yet ready-made solutions that simplify implementation. These platforms often include APIs for specific tasks like speech recognition, image analysis, or natural language processing and allow businesses to work alongside the best experts in the business.

    • Pros:
      • Faster time to market thanks to reduced technical barriers and deployment timelines
      • Pre-trained models with high accuracy
      • Dedicated support teams
    • Cons:
      • Reliance on a third party
      • Ongoing subscription costs
    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    Asking the right questions

    The question of build or buy can be a daunting one. With a sea of moving parts and an endless list of goals, it can be overwhelming for teams to clearly define the best path forward. For anyone considering the pros and cons of various AI integration options, having answers to the right questions—and knowing what those questions are—is paramount.

    1. How will you ensure the model achieves and maintains continuous, state-of-the-art accuracy?
    2. How will you manage competing engineering and development priorities?
    3. How will you source diverse, robust training data?
    4. How will the model handle custom vocabulary needs?
    5. Do you have the internal expertise to build or will you need to hire additional experts?
    6. Do you have a thorough understanding of AI and speech recognition best practices?
    7. How will you handle the ongoing maintenance of the model?
    8. How will you quickly handle mission-critical support requests?
    9. Do you have a clear understanding of the startup and ongoing costs of building in-house versus partnering with a third party?
    10. How will you ensure data security and compliance?
    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    Key takeaways

    AI holds transformative potential, but its integration comes with challenges that demand careful consideration. Whether you choose to build in-house, leverage open-source tools, or partner with an AI provider, the right approach depends on your organization’s unique goals, resources, and expertise.

    Despite a significant learning curve and the need for staffed AI experts, industry leaders are no less eager to integrate. What our insights showed as the primary workaround to these challenges, is a strategic partnership with AI providers that deliver cutting-edge capabilities that don’t require heavy lifting from your team. These partnerships not only free up internal business resources, but they allow teams to think bigger and move faster than ever before.

    Get the full picture of what industry leaders are doing in the age of AI and how they approached the question of build or buy, in our 2024 Insights Report.

    Click here to access the full research report:

    Build or buy? What industry leaders are choosing

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleLangChain vs LlamaIndex: Choosing the Right Framework for Your LLM Application
    Next Article Last Week in AI #296 – new Gemini model tops leaderboard, xAI gets funding, Pixtral Large

    Related Posts

    Development

    February 2025 Baseline monthly digest

    May 18, 2025
    Artificial Intelligence

    Markus Buehler receives 2025 Washington Award

    May 18, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    Functions in CSS?!

    News & Updates

    Ubuntu 25.10 is Officially Named ‘Questing Quokka’

    Linux

    Best Free and Open Source Alternatives to Progress Kemp LoadMaster

    Linux

    CVE-2025-47737 – Trailer lib.rs Zero-Sized Allocation Mishandle

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    Artificial Intelligence

    AI’s impact on the job market: Conflicting signals in the early days

    April 29, 2025

    As more real-world data on AI’s economic impact on the job market is revealed, the…

    AgentGen: Automating Environment and Task Generation to Enhance Planning Abilities in LLM-Based Agents with 592 Environments and 7,246 Trajectories

    August 4, 2024

    MLPs vs KANs: Evaluating Performance in Machine Learning, Computer Vision, NLP, and Symbolic Tasks

    August 3, 2024

    Viro3D: A Comprehensive Resource of Predicted Viral Protein Structures Unveils Evolutionary Insights and Functional Annotations

    December 22, 2024
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.