Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 16, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 16, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 16, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025

      Minecraft licensing robbed us of this controversial NFL schedule release video

      May 16, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025

      Simplify Factory Associations with Laravel’s UseFactory Attribute

      May 16, 2025

      This Week in Laravel: React Native, PhpStorm Junie, and more

      May 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»This AI Paper from ETH Zurich Introduces DINKEL: A State-Aware Query Generation Framework for Testing GDBMS (Graph Database Management Systems)

    This AI Paper from ETH Zurich Introduces DINKEL: A State-Aware Query Generation Framework for Testing GDBMS (Graph Database Management Systems)

    August 22, 2024

    Graph database management systems (GDBMSs) have become essential in today’s data-driven world, which requires more and more management of complex, highly interconnected data for social networking, recommendation systems, and large language models. Graph systems efficiently store and manipulate graphs to quickly retrieve data for relationship analysis. The reliability of GDBMS will then be crucial for sectors in which data integrity is very important, such as finance and social media.

    Despite high diffusion, the intrinsic complexity and dynamic data changes these systems handle are serious problems and hassles in the GDBMS. A bug in these systems could create serious problems, including data corruption and possible security flaws. For instance, these bugs in GDBMS can lead to denial-of-service attacks or information disclosure that will be disastrous in high-assurance applications. As both the systems and the nature of the queries they process are very complex, their detection and resolution are quite challenging; hence, these bugs might pose a severe reliability and security risk.

    State-of-the-art techniques for testing GDBMS generate queries in Cypher, the most widely adopted graph query language. However, these techniques only generate relatively small complexity queries and fully model state changes and data dependencies typical of complex real-world applications. Indeed, state-of-the-art approaches usually cover a small portion of the functionality offered by GDBMSs and fail to detect bugs that may compromise system integrity. These deficiencies underline the need for more sophisticated testing tools capable of accurately modeling complex operations in GDBMS.

    That being the case, ETH Zurich researchers have proposed an alternative way of testing GDBMS focusing on state-aware query generation. The team implemented this approach as a fully automatic GDBMS testing framework, DINKEL. This method enables modeling the dynamic states of a graph database to create complex Cypher queries that represent real-life data manipulation in GDBMS. In contrast to traditional techniques, DINKEL permits the continuous update of state information about a graph during the generation of queries, thus guaranteeing that every independent query reflects a database’s possible states and dependencies. Hence, this multi-state change and complex data interaction empower queries to enable the testing of GDBMS with high test coverage and effectiveness.

    Another approach by DINKEL is based on the systematic modeling of graph states, divided by query context and graph schema. Query context contains information about the temporary variables declared in the queries; graph schema includes information on current graph labels and properties. On the generation of Cypher queries, DINKEL incrementally constructs every query, drawing on information about the current state of the graph’s accessible elements and updating state information as the query evolves. This state awareness guarantees syntactical correctness but also ensures real-world scenarios are represented by the queries generated from DINKEL, enabling the revelation of bugs that would have flown under the radar.

    The results of DINKEL performance are really impressive. His extensive testing on three major open-source GDBMSs—Neo4j, RedisGraph, and Apache AGE—DINKEL showed a brilliant validity rate for complex Cypher queries of 93.43%. In a 48-hour test campaign, DINKEL exposed 60 unique bugs, among which 58 were confirmed, and the developers later fixed 51. By applying this methodology, DINKEL could cover over 60% more code than the best baseline testing techniques, thus demonstrating improved deep bug-exposing ability. Most of these bugs were previously unknown and involved tricky logic or state changes in the GDBMS, underpinning the effectiveness of DINKEL’s state-aware query generation.

    The approach by the ETH Zurich team serves a needy cause in testing GDBMS. They have developed a state-aware approach to generating queries for building this tool, drastically improving complex bug detection that hazard reliability and security in graph database systems. Results Their work, materialized through DINKEL, showed remarkable improvements in test coverage and bug detection. This advance is a step ahead in GDBMS robustness assurance; DINKEL is one relevant tool for developers and researchers.

    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and join our Telegram Channel and LinkedIn Group. If you like our work, you will love our newsletter..

    Don’t Forget to join our 49k+ ML SubReddit

    Find Upcoming AI Webinars here

    The post This AI Paper from ETH Zurich Introduces DINKEL: A State-Aware Query Generation Framework for Testing GDBMS (Graph Database Management Systems) appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Hostinger
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleSnowflake Arctic models are now available in Amazon SageMaker JumpStart
    Next Article Speculative Retrieval Augmented Generation (Speculative RAG): A Novel Framework Enhancing Accuracy and Efficiency in Knowledge-intensive Query Processing with LLMs

    Related Posts

    Security

    Nmap 7.96 Launches with Lightning-Fast DNS and 612 Scripts

    May 17, 2025
    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2024-47893 – VMware GPU Firmware Memory Disclosure

    May 17, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    Tech support scams leverage Google ads again and again, fleecing unsuspecting internet users

    Development

    CVE-2025-23180 – Apache HTTP Server Unprivileged Process Execution

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-36557 – F5 Big-IP HTTP Enforce RFC Compliance Remote Denial of Service

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-2775 – SysAid On-Prem XXE Remote Code Execution

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)
    GetResponse

    Highlights

    Development

    Unlocking the Future of Enterprise AI: Databricks announces Anthropic Partnership

    March 26, 2025

    The recent strategic partnership between Databricks and Anthropic is a big step forward for enabling…

    ChatGPT can carry out daily recurring tasks for you now – how to get started

    January 15, 2025

    Rundll32.exe Application Error – How To Resolve It Easily

    January 22, 2025

    Future-Proofing Business Continuity: BCDR Trends and Challenges for 2025

    March 16, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.