Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 16, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 16, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 16, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025

      Minecraft licensing robbed us of this controversial NFL schedule release video

      May 16, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025

      Simplify Factory Associations with Laravel’s UseFactory Attribute

      May 16, 2025

      This Week in Laravel: React Native, PhpStorm Junie, and more

      May 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Decoding Decoder-Only Transformers: Insights from Google DeepMind’s Paper

    Decoding Decoder-Only Transformers: Insights from Google DeepMind’s Paper

    June 9, 2024

    A major challenge in the field of natural language processing (NLP) is addressing the limitations of decoder-only Transformers. These models, which form the backbone of large language models (LLMs), suffer from significant issues such as representational collapse and over-squashing. Representational collapse occurs when different input sequences produce nearly identical representations, while over-squashing leads to a loss of sensitivity to specific tokens due to the unidirectional flow of information. These challenges severely hinder the ability of LLMs to perform essential tasks like counting or copying sequences accurately, which are fundamental for various computational and reasoning tasks in AI applications.

    Current methods to tackle these challenges involve increasing model complexity and enhancing training datasets. Techniques such as using higher precision floating-point formats and incorporating more sophisticated positional encodings have been explored. However, these methods are computationally expensive and often impractical for real-time applications. Existing approaches also include the use of auxiliary tools to assist models in performing specific tasks. Despite these efforts, fundamental issues like representational collapse and over-squashing persist due to the inherent limitations of the decoder-only Transformer architecture and the low-precision floating-point formats commonly used.

    Researchers from Google DeepMind and the University of Oxford propose a theoretical signal propagation analysis to investigate how information is processed within decoder-only Transformers. They focus on the representation of the last token in the final layer, which is crucial for next-token prediction. The proposed approach identifies and formalizes the phenomena of representational collapse and over-squashing. Representational collapse is shown to occur when distinct input sequences yield nearly identical representations due to low-precision floating-point computations. Over-squashing is analyzed by examining how information from earlier tokens is disproportionately squashed, leading to reduced model sensitivity. This approach is significant as it provides a new theoretical framework to understand these limitations and offers simple yet effective solutions to mitigate them.

    The proposed method involves a detailed theoretical analysis supported by empirical evidence. The researchers use mathematical proofs and experimental data to demonstrate representational collapse and over-squashing. They employ contemporary LLMs to validate their findings and illustrate how low floating-point precision exacerbates these issues. The analysis includes examining attention weights, layer normalization effects, and positional encoding decay. The researchers also discuss practical implications, such as the impact of quantization and tokenization on model performance, and propose adding additional tokens to long sequences as a practical solution to prevent representational collapse.

    The results demonstrate that decoder-only Transformer models experience significant performance issues due to representational collapse and over-squashing, particularly in tasks requiring counting and copying sequences. Experiments conducted on contemporary large language models (LLMs) reveal a marked decline in accuracy as sequence length increases, with models struggling to differentiate between distinct sequences. The empirical evidence supports the theoretical analysis, showing that low-precision floating-point formats exacerbate these issues, leading to frequent errors in next-token prediction. Importantly, the proposed solutions, such as introducing additional tokens in sequences and adjusting floating-point precision, were empirically validated, leading to notable improvements in model performance and robustness in handling longer sequences. These findings highlight the critical need to address fundamental architectural limitations in LLMs to enhance their accuracy and reliability in practical applications.

    In conclusion, the paper provides a thorough analysis of the limitations inherent in decoder-only Transformer models, specifically focusing on the issues of representational collapse and over-squashing. Through both theoretical exploration and empirical validation, the authors demonstrate how these phenomena impair the performance of large language models (LLMs) in essential tasks such as counting and copying sequences. The study identifies critical architectural flaws exacerbated by low-precision floating-point formats and proposes effective solutions to mitigate these problems, including the introduction of additional tokens and precision adjustments. These interventions significantly enhance model performance, making them more reliable and accurate for practical applications. The findings underscore the importance of addressing these fundamental issues to advance the capabilities of LLMs in natural language processing tasks.

    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter. Join our Telegram Channel, Discord Channel, and LinkedIn Group.

    If you like our work, you will love our newsletter..

    Don’t Forget to join our 44k+ ML SubReddit

    Transformers need glasses!

    Read on to see how we expose fundamental weaknesses of decoder-only Transformers on important tasks (e.g. copying & counting) + simple ways to make things a bit easier on the Transformer

    Work led by @fedzbar for his @GoogleDeepMind placement! pic.twitter.com/UeZamTF3Ee

    — Petar Veličković (@PetarV_93) June 7, 2024

    The post Decoding Decoder-Only Transformers: Insights from Google DeepMind’s Paper appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleEvery Vusers should pick new file
    Next Article Buffer of Thoughts (BoT): A Novel Thought-Augmented Reasoning AI Approach for Enhancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Robustness of LLMs

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    LLMs Struggle with Real Conversations: Microsoft and Salesforce Researchers Reveal a 39% Performance Drop in Multi-Turn Underspecified Tasks

    May 17, 2025
    Machine Learning

    This AI paper from DeepSeek-AI Explores How DeepSeek-V3 Delivers High-Performance Language Modeling by Minimizing Hardware Overhead and Maximizing Computational Efficiency

    May 17, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Hostinger

    Continue Reading

    FireScam Android Malware Poses as Telegram Premium to Steal Data and Control Devices

    Development

    Working With Multiple CSS Anchors and Popovers Inside the WordPress Loop

    News & Updates

    Distribution Release: Grml 2024.12

    Development

    CVE-2025-1330 – IBM CICS TX DNS Code Injection

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    Forrester shares its top 10 emerging technology trends for 2024

    June 25, 2024

    Forrester is revealing its top 10 emerging technology trends for 2024, which is a list…

    Worker Threads in Node.js: A Comprehensive Guide to Multi-Threading

    February 5, 2025

    Isembard raised $9M to address manufacturing capacity crisis in the West

    April 24, 2025

    3 clever ChatGPT tricks that prove it’s still the AI to beat

    April 22, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.