Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 16, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 16, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 16, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025

      Minecraft licensing robbed us of this controversial NFL schedule release video

      May 16, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025

      Simplify Factory Associations with Laravel’s UseFactory Attribute

      May 16, 2025

      This Week in Laravel: React Native, PhpStorm Junie, and more

      May 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»How do Language Agents Perform in Translating Long-Text Novels? Meet TransAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework Using LLMs to Tackle the Complexities of Literary Translation

    How do Language Agents Perform in Translating Long-Text Novels? Meet TransAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework Using LLMs to Tackle the Complexities of Literary Translation

    May 26, 2024

    Machine translation (MT) has made impressive progress in recent years, driven by breakthroughs in deep learning and neural networks. However, the challenge of literary translations for MT systems is difficult to solve. Literary texts, known for their complex language, figurative expressions, cultural variations, and unique feature styles, create problems that are hard for machines to overcome  Due to this complexity, literary translation becomes one of the most challenging areas within machine translation, often referred to as “the last frontier of machine translation”

    Large language models (LLMs) have transformed the field of AI. These models are pre-trained on a huge amount of text data, learning to predict the next word in a sentence. After pretraining, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or instruction tuning (IT) is used for fine-tuning the models using the instructions, allowing them to adapt their general language knowledge. Another method is multi-agent systems intelligent agents are developed to understand their environments, make good decisions, and react with suitable actions. Moreover, MT has achieved more advancements recently, which include general-purpose MT, low-resource MT, multilingual MT, and non-autoregressive MT. 

    Researchers from Monash University, the University of Macau, and Tencent AI Lab introduced TRANSAGENTS, a multi-agent system for literary translation that can tackle complex details of literary works by utilizing multi-agent methods. Despite the method showing bad performance in terms of d-BLEU scores, it is preferred by human evaluators and an LLM evaluator over human-written references and GPT-4 translations. TRANSAGENTS can generate translations with more detailed and diverse descriptions, and it is 80 times less costly compared to professional human translators during the cost analysis for literary text translation. 

    Two evaluation strategies, Monolingual Human Preference (MHP) and Bilingual LLM Preference (BLP) are also introduced by the researchers to evaluate the quality of translations. MHP focuses on the effect of translation on the target audience, giving importance to fluidity and suitable culture, while BLP compares translations directly with the original texts using advanced LLMs. Researchers presented an in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses, especially in translation systems based on LLM, including GPT-4 and TRANSAGENTS, showing certain limitations on problems related to content omission. 

    TRANSAGENTS is compared with other methods, such as REFERENCE 1 and GPT-4- 1106-PREVIEW using monolingual human preference evaluations. Results show that human evaluators prefer the translations generated by TRANSAGENTS over the other two methods mentioned. Moreover, the models are evaluated using BLP, and the results show that GPT-4-0125-PREVIEW prefers translations produced by TRANSAGENTS more, showing its robust preference for detailed and diverse descriptions while evaluating literary translations. Also, REFERENCE 1 costs $168.48 per chapter for the translations, but TRANSAGENTS costs $500 for the entire test set, which is 80 times cheaper. 

    In conclusion, researchers introduced  TRANSAGENTS, a multi-agent virtual company designed for literary translation that reflects the traditional translation publication process. Further, two strategies, MHP and BLP are introduced to evaluate the quality of translations. Despite the lower d-BLEU scores, the translations generated by TRANSAGENTS are preferred over human-written references by human evaluators and language models, and it is 80 times less costly compared to professional human translators for literary text translation. However, certain limitations of TRANSAGENTS highlight the problem in machine translation (MT) evaluation approaches like bad evaluation metrics and the reliability of reference translations

    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter. Join our Telegram Channel, Discord Channel, and LinkedIn Group.

    If you like our work, you will love our newsletter..

    Don’t Forget to join our 42k+ ML SubReddit

    The post How do Language Agents Perform in Translating Long-Text Novels? Meet TransAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework Using LLMs to Tackle the Complexities of Literary Translation appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleHow to Fine-tune GPT-3.5 for Outreach Emails
    Next Article Boost Your Data Analysis with Google Gemini’s Advanced 1.5 Pro’s New Spreadsheet Upload Feature

    Related Posts

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-4610 – WordPress WP-Members Membership Plugin Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

    May 17, 2025
    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-4824 – TOTOLINK A702R, A3002R, A3002RU HTTP POST Request Handler Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

    May 17, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    CVE-2025-4314 – SourceCodester Advanced Web Store SQL Injection Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-4196 – SourceCodester Patient Record Management System SQL Injection Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-29690 – OA System Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-46745 – Apache User Account Information Disclosure

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)
    Hostinger

    Highlights

    This great cordless vacuum is just $47 with this 4th of July deal

    July 1, 2024

    The 15,000Pa-suction Monozel handheld cordless vacuum is said to rival a Dyson, and it’s 80%…

    CVE-2025-4481 – SourceCodester Apartment Visitor Management System SQL Injection Vulnerability

    May 9, 2025

    NYU Researchers Open-Sourced GPUDrive: A GPU-Accelerated Multi-Agent Driving Simulation at 1 Million FPS

    August 8, 2024

    Salesforce Einstein AI: Navigating a user journey with Voice enabled e-commerce evolution

    June 26, 2024
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.