Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 16, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 16, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 16, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025

      Minecraft licensing robbed us of this controversial NFL schedule release video

      May 16, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025

      Simplify Factory Associations with Laravel’s UseFactory Attribute

      May 16, 2025

      This Week in Laravel: React Native, PhpStorm Junie, and more

      May 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»The Representative Capacity of Transformer Language Models LMs with n-gram Language Models LMs: Capturing the Parallelizable Nature of n-gram LMs

    The Representative Capacity of Transformer Language Models LMs with n-gram Language Models LMs: Capturing the Parallelizable Nature of n-gram LMs

    April 27, 2024

    Neural language models (LMs) have become popular due to their extensive theoretical work mostly focusing on representational capacity. An earlier study of representational capacity using Boolean sequential models helps in a proper understanding of its lower and upper bound and the potential of the transformer architecture. LMs have become the backbone of many NLP tasks, and most state-of-the-art LMs are based on transformer architecture. In addition, formal models of computation offer a smooth and accurate formulation to study different aspects of probability distributions that LMs can handle.

    However, LM architecture is mostly examined in the context of binary language recognition, which creates a category error between LM (distribution over strings) and theoretical abstraction (a set of strings). To solve this issue, it is important to figure out the classes of probability distributions over strings represented by the transformer. Moreover, the analysis of architecture for language acceptance is the major area of focus for most researchers. However, researchers of this paper argue that this is not the optimal approach to solving such a problem in the field of LMs, which are probability distributions over strings.

    Researchers from ETH Zurich studied the representative capacity of transformer LMs with n-gram LMs. They successfully demonstrated that it is easy to capture the parallelizable nature of n-gram LMs with the help of transformer architecture, offering various lower bounds on the probabilistic representational capacity of transformer LMs. These transformer LMs consist of multiple transformer layers and represent n-gram LMs using hard and sparse attention, showcasing various ways transformer LMs can simulate n-gram LMs. It utilizes the attention mechanism to enhance the input representations, including queries, keys, and values, by evaluating their updated versions.

    Researchers gave two theorems to explain the representative capacity of hard attention transformer LMs. The first theorem states that, for any n-gram LM, there exists a weakly equivalent single-layer hard attention trans former LM with n – 1 head. Its proof intuition is that a weakly equivalent LM defined by a transformer is constructed that looks back at the preceding n – 1 positions using n – 1 heads. The second theorem states that, for any n-gram LM, there exists a weakly equivalent n – 1-layer hard attention trans former LM with a single head. Its proof intuition is that an n – 1 layer transformer LM can use the n – 1 layers to look back at the immediately preceding position and copy it forward n – 1 times.

    Transformer LMs and traditional LMs are connected to capture any n-gram LM using the method of hard and sparse attention transformer LMs, which provides a stable lower bound on their probabilistic representational capacity. Moreover, the role of several heads and the number of layers consists of a balance between the number of heads, layers, and the complexity of the non-linear transformations required to simulate n-gram LMs. Overall, these results contribute to the probabilistic representational capacity of transformer LMs and the mechanisms they might utilize to execute formal computational models.

    In conclusion, Researchers from ETHzurich studied the representative capacity of transformer LMs with n-gram LMs, capturing the parallelizable nature of n-gram LMs using the transformer architecture and providing multiple lower bounds. Researchers showed that transformer LMs can represent n-gram LMs using hard and sparse attention, demonstrating various mechanisms they can utilize to present n-gram LMs. However, some limitations have been highlighted for future work: n-gram LMs represent a very simple class of LMs, resulting in loose lower bounds, making the transformer LMs exhibit a more complex structure than n-gram LMs. 

    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter. Join our Telegram Channel, Discord Channel, and LinkedIn Group.

    If you like our work, you will love our newsletter..

    Don’t Forget to join our 40k+ ML SubReddit

    The post The Representative Capacity of Transformer Language Models LMs with n-gram Language Models LMs: Capturing the Parallelizable Nature of n-gram LMs appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleNot able to add Bug from Testlink to JIRA (Required Version Number)
    Next Article Advancing Time Series Forecasting: The Impact of Bi-Mamba4TS’s Bidirectional State Space Modeling on Long-Term Predictive Accuracy

    Related Posts

    Security

    Nmap 7.96 Launches with Lightning-Fast DNS and 612 Scripts

    May 17, 2025
    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2024-47893 – VMware GPU Firmware Memory Disclosure

    May 17, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    5 Major Benefits of Azure Integration Services Over MuleSoft

    Development

    The Pursuit of the Platonic Representation: AI’s Quest for a Unified Model of Reality

    Development

    CVE-2025-20216 – Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    How to build a Connect Four game in HTML, CSS, and Vanilla

    Development
    Hostinger

    Highlights

    Databases

    Introducing smaller capacity units for Amazon Neptune Analytics: Up to 75% cheaper to get started with graph analytics workloads

    July 30, 2024

    Amazon Neptune Analytics is an analytics database engine for quickly analyzing large volumes of graph…

    CVE-2025-43865 – React Router HTTP Header Injection Vulnerability

    April 24, 2025

    CVE-2025-43962 – LibRaw Out-of-Bounds Read Vulnerability

    April 20, 2025

    What is Project Stargate? Why this $500-billion AI initiative could herald a ‘platform shift’

    January 23, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.