Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 16, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 16, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 16, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025

      Minecraft licensing robbed us of this controversial NFL schedule release video

      May 16, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      The power of generators

      May 16, 2025

      Simplify Factory Associations with Laravel’s UseFactory Attribute

      May 16, 2025

      This Week in Laravel: React Native, PhpStorm Junie, and more

      May 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft has closed its “Experience Center” store in Sydney, Australia — as it ramps up a continued digital growth campaign

      May 16, 2025

      Bing Search APIs to be “decommissioned completely” as Microsoft urges developers to use its Azure agentic AI alternative

      May 16, 2025

      Microsoft might kill the Surface Laptop Studio as production is quietly halted

      May 16, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»This AI Paper Explores the Fundamental Aspects of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF): Aiming to Clarify its Mechanisms and Limitations

    This AI Paper Explores the Fundamental Aspects of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF): Aiming to Clarify its Mechanisms and Limitations

    April 17, 2024

    Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in various industries and are not just limited to basic language tasks. These models are used in sectors like technology, healthcare, finance, and education and can transform stable workflows in these critical sectors. A method called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is used to make LLMs safe, trustworthy, and exhibit human-like qualities. RLHF became popular because of its ability to solve Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems like simulated robotic locomotion and playing Atari games by utilizing human feedback about preferences on demonstrated behaviors. It is often used to finetune LLMs using human feedback.

    State-of-the-art LLMs are important tools for solving complex tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. The RLHF approach, which utilizes human feedback to update the model on human preferences, can be used to solve this issue and reduce problems like toxicity and hallucinations. However, understanding RLHF is largely complicated by the initial design choices that popularized the method. In this paper, the focus is on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework.

    Researchers from the University of Massachusetts, IIT Delhi, Princeton University, Georgia Tech, and The Allen Institute for AI equally contributed to developing a comprehensive understanding of RLHF by analyzing the core components of the method. They adopted a Bayesian perspective of RLHF to design this method’s foundational questions and highlight the reward function’s importance. The reward function forms the central cog of the RLHF procedure, and to model this function, the formulation of RLHF depends on a set of assumptions. Analysis carried out by researchers leads to the formation of an oracular reward that serves as the theoretical golden standard for future efforts.

    The main aim of reward learning in RLHF is to convert human feedback into an optimized reward function. Reward functions provide a dual purpose: they encode relevant information for measuring and inducing alignment with human objectives. With the help of the reward function, RL algorithms can be used to learn a language model policy to maximize the cumulative reward, resulting in an aligned language model. Two methods described in this paper are:

    Value-based methods: These methods focus on learning the value of states based on the expected cumulative reward from that state following a policy.

    Policy-gradient methods: Involve training a parameterized policy by using reward feedback. This approach applies gradient ascent to the policy parameters to maximize the expected cumulative reward.

    An overview of the RLHF procedure along with the various challenges studied in this work:

    Researchers finetuned RLHF of Language Models (LMs) by integrating the trained reward model. Also, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) algorithms are used to update the parameters of the LM. It helps maximize the obtained reward using generated outputs. These are called policy-gradient algorithms that update the policy parameters directly using evaluative reward feedback. Moreover, the training process includes the pre-trained/SFT language model that is prompted with contexts from a prompting dataset. However, this dataset may or may not be identical to the one used for collecting human demonstrations in the SFT phase.

    In conclusion, researchers worked on the fundamental aspects of RLHF to highlight its mechanism and limitations. They critically analyzed the reward models that constitute the core component of RLHF and highlighted the impact of different implementation choices. This paper addresses the challenges faced while learning these reward functions, showing both the practical and fundamental limitations of RLHF. Other aspects, including the types of feedback, the details and variations of training algorithms, and alternative methods for achieving alignment without using RL, are also discussed in this paper.

    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter. Join our Telegram Channel, Discord Channel, and LinkedIn Group.

    If you like our work, you will love our newsletter..

    Don’t Forget to join our 40k+ ML SubReddit

    Want to get in front of 1.5 Million AI Audience? Work with us here

    The post This AI Paper Explores the Fundamental Aspects of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF): Aiming to Clarify its Mechanisms and Limitations appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleProgrammatic approach to optimize the cost of Amazon RDS snapshots
    Next Article Google AI Proposes TransformerFAM: A Novel Transformer Architecture that Leverages a Feedback Loop to Enable the Neural Network to Attend to Its Latent Representations

    Related Posts

    Security

    Nmap 7.96 Launches with Lightning-Fast DNS and 612 Scripts

    May 16, 2025
    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-47916 – Invision Community Themeeditor Remote Code Execution

    May 16, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Hostinger

    Continue Reading

    iOS 18.3.1 patches an ‘extremely sophisticated attack’ – and more

    News & Updates

    Santander Confirms Data Breach, Assures Customers’ Transactions Remain Secure

    Development

    How to debug code with GitHub Copilot

    News & Updates

    Loc-OS – Linux distribution based on Debian

    Linux
    Hostinger

    Highlights

    Development

    Video annotator: building video classifiers using vision-language models and active learning

    June 19, 2024

    Video annotator: a framework for efficiently building video classifiers using vision-language models and active learning Amir…

    A Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine embedded into the Python VM

    July 30, 2024

    CVE-2025-46374 – Apache HTTP Server Cross-Site Request Forgery

    April 24, 2025

    Rilasciata BleachBit 5.0: la nuova versione del software open source per la pulizia di sistema su GNU/Linux

    May 7, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.