American video game giant Roblox has reported a data breach stemming from a third-party service provider that helps host its…
Development
Cloudflare’s privacy-first public DNS resolver service was hit by two simultaneous BGP issues recently, resulting in an unintentional BGP hijacking…
Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL) researchers have uncovered an active campaign exploiting a Microsoft SmartScreen vulnerability to inject infostealers…
Post Content Source: Read MoreÂ
Post Content Source: Read MoreÂ
Post Content Source: Read MoreÂ
Natural language processing is advancing rapidly, focusing on optimizing large language models (LLMs) for specific tasks. These models, often containing…
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 have made significant strides in AI research, outperforming previous state-of-the-art methods across…
For true parallel execution of Selenium tests in NUnit, does the setup of the webdriver object need to be within the test method itself? Or is there a better way?
Previously, for parallel execution at the fixture level, I was able to create single objects (per fixture) within the [Setup] and backend methods. However, when moving towards test & fixture parallelism, I began encountering problems where tests within one fixture were all trying to access the same driver object.
I did manage to get a solution which involved [ThreadStatic] against the static driver object but this resulted in every test run keeping its driver object open till all had finished, which just seemed wrong.
I’m keen to push driver setup out of the tests and back toward [Setup] and backend methods, to reduce code duplication and keep the test method focussed on the test. I’ve researched the area but only seemed to come across fixture-level parallel execution but am keen for the full-on test & fixture-level parallel execution so I welcome any suggestions!
As Part of JMeter WEB DRIVER(Selenium Scripts) Integration With Azure Pipeline.I have pushed the scripts into Azure GIT Repository and how can I add jp@gc- chrome config sampler in Azure Pipeline? Normally we add jp@gc – Chrome Driver Config in follwing way https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44428349/jmeter-jpgc-webdriver-sampler but when it comes to adding in Azure Pipeline? Could anyone please help me
I have found the following questions regarding statement coverage.
Minimum Test Required for Statement Coverage:
Disc = 0
Order-qty = 0
Read Order-qty
If Order-qty >=20 then
Disc = 0.05
If Order-qty >=100 then
Disc =0.1
End if
End if
In my opinion, we need 2 statement coverage. But the correct answer is 1 statement based on many websites.
I don’t understand why only one statement coverage is needed.
Say I have a page with search function. The search function has 21 search criteria. If I want to test all combinations of criteria can be used, to calculate the number of times to test should be 21! Factorial = 51090942171709440000 times. So my question is, other than testing only the individual function of each searching criteria, how to test for the combinations of searching criteria in this case? By prioritizing only the important criteria or how?
Some example of search criteria includes,
created time from,
created time to,
created by,
updated time from,
updated time to,
is mapped,
league name.
home name,
away name,
system league name,
system home name,
system away name,
is special,
is ignored,
sport type,
is opened, etc,
user can use to search the sports game based on the criteria matched
Do you find your Linux desktop background rather mundane but have problems in finding attractive wallpapers? The post 19 Best…
Here are seven of the best Elden Ring DLC builds I’ve put together using Shadow of the Erdtree’s new weapons,…
Start Your Own ChatGPT Office with AI Agents: Revolutionize Your Business with Intelligent Virtual Assistants by Srinidhi Ranganathan – Audiobooks…
Despite controversies surrounding Recall, Microsoft is spotted running ads for the problematic Copilot+ PCs feature. The post Despite recalling Recall,…
Create surveys inside your Laravel app Source: Read MoreÂ
Some of those CodePen experiments have been focusing on recreating recognizable logos using only CSS. These impressive feats showcase not…
If you have recently started taking your first steps in product or UX design, don’t stop reading. This article is…
Despite outlining the urgency and the need for community involvement to keep the project maintained, proposing several options for the…