Development

im trying to use Openloads API in python, i can do a remote upload like this:

ol_url = driver.current_url
resp = ol.remote_upload(ol_url)
file_id = resp.get(‘id’)

Now i have a file uploaded in Openload and his ID, and now i want to know the Link or the Embed of this remote uploaded file.

I have been searching info for a long time and nothing, someone can help me? Please

How do we implement LoadableComponent, when we have a fluent API, lets create a basic set of classes, shown below:
public class LoginPage {

// @FindBy locators

public DashboardPage login(String user, String pass) {
// something
}
}

public class DashboardPage {

// @FindBy locators

public UsersPage navigateToUsersPage() {
//navigate to users page
}
}

Now, we have a test maybe something like this:
@Test
public void coolTest() {
loginPage.open().login(“foo”, “bar”).navigateToUsersPage();
//assert something
}

Where does loadable component come into play here?
How can we ensure the page(s) are loaded, when they should be etc?
We aren’t explicitly calling open on 2 of the 3 pages used here.

I’m running into an issue with getting the traffic from a WCF-based Windows desktop client to show up in the JMeter recorder – and I’m hoping someone out there might be able to point me in the right direction.

Complicating things a bit, I’m not working directly with the developers of the system, but rather for one of their customers – which somewhat limits my access to some of the information and expertise I would otherwise expect to have. The client runs over WCF with a binding to an HTTPS endpoint on Azure.

I have JMeter running on the same box as the client. I have the JMeter Proxy Server working and the ApacheJMeterTemporaryRootCA.crt in place and working. The client doesn’t have it’s own proxy settings, but does appear to be honoring useDefaultWebProxy=”true” (as indicated by the client failing with SSL security warnings when the temp cert isn’t in place). However, when I exercise the client with the HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder running, none of the traffic to and from the client ever shows up in the recorder. When I use a browser under the same setup, the traffic is getting recorded as expected.

Being able to get the recorder working is vital because I don’t have access to enough information about the client’s protocols to try building out tests for them manually (and I suspect it may prove outside of my skillset, given my very limited experience with WCF).

Any useful solutions, suggestions, tips, or pointers would be GREATLY appreciated!

(I’m posting this question in XXXXX to maximize my chances of getting the right answer quickly. If this type of cross-posting is frowned upon, I apologize for any inconvenience.)

Best,

Justin

“If you can’t tell me what you tested, you might as well have not tested.”

I have designed a case to wait for specific model name in GET response and then POST data. It is tested and is working fine when only 1 user and 1 loop are set. When the specific model name is found, then proceed to deploy the model.
JSON Extractor
$..valid_model_list[?(@.model_name =~ /.*Model-Test-${variable}-${counter}-v1-8k/i)]

While Controller
${__jexl3(“${modelnameresult_matchNr}” != “1”,)}

However, when I ramp up the test to use 2 users and 2 loops. The result isn’t as per expectation.

Question 1: Why JMeter isn’t running the request in sequence when multiple users and loop are set?
How do I design it in a better way to avoid false-positives in results?
Question 2: The GET (TrainedModelsList) constant timer is set to 1 minute and expectation is that it continues running till the end of the test. It seems it just run to a certain period and stopped. What type of timer should be used in this case?
JMeter deployed these model successfully
Model-Test-2022-02-28T09:46:40784-0001-v1-8k
Model-Test-2022-02-28T09:46:42785-0002-v1-8k
Model-Test-2022-02-28T09:46:44784-0003-v1-8k
Model-Test-2022-02-28T09:46:46783-0004-v1-8k

JMeter start deploy the model and fail although these models are not yet found:
Model-Test-2022-02-28T10:02:51745-0006-v1-8k
Model-Test-2022-02-28T10:18:18831-0007-v1-8k
Model-Test-2022-02-28T10:34:21111-0008-v1-8k
Model-Test-2022-02-28T10:50:24376-0009-v1-8k

Updated with view result notes where the problem occurred at second loop:

Serverless computing is changing how we see cloud computing and Software Development Services. It takes away the tough job of managing servers, allowing developers to focus on creating new apps without worrying about costs or the resources needed to run them. This shift gives businesses many benefits they become more flexible, easier to grow, and
The post Exploring Serverless Architecture: Pros and Cons. appeared first on Codoid.

A Friendly Introduction to Container Queries * Gentrified by design Source: Read MoreÂ