Libraries & Frameworks

In today’s world, we rely on our mobile devices. Because of this, a good user experience is very important. A key part of getting this is careful API testing. This blog will help you learn the basics of mobile app API testing. You will see why it matters, the types involved, how to put it
The post Mobile App API Testing Essentials Explained appeared first on Codoid.

There is a tool developed based on Monaco Editor. I have been looking for a framework or a library to used for testing this. Still there is no luck with that. Appreciate your directions if there is any direction regarding this.
Should I proceed with x-path for interacting elements inside the editor or is there any better approach?
NOTE : At the moment I’m using Cypress as the testing framework.

Effective data management is critical for business resilience in an era of rapid data creation. The blog discusses how data management can drive long-term success. A robust strategy is essential as businesses face growing volumes of data and evolving cyber threats. This includes regular backups, secure storage, and real-time monitoring. Implementing disaster recovery plans and flexible tools helps maintain operational continuity.
The post Enhancing Business Resilience with Strategic Data Management  first appeared on TestingXperts.

In today’s challenging market for mobile apps, providing a smooth user experience is essential. Mobile app testing is a key part of the development process. This involves examining every section of the app closely. This practice ensures that the app works properly, runs without problems, and offers users a good experience. Key Highlights Important in
The post Essential Mobile App Testing Checklist appeared first on Codoid.

I’m currently estimating QA efforts for huge enterprise web portal (about 5k+ hrs DEV efforts / 1.5k hrs QA), based on Liferay / Alfresco platforms / solutions. One of the requirements – 3 interface languages user may switch from any page (place) of the solution.

So the question is that simple: is there any common practice to estimate localization testing as percentage of overall functional testing efforts?

The following assumptions / aspects are actual as well:

2 of 3 languages are common and do not require any special skills for checking from QA team; the 3rd language is uncommon (however, not TOTALLY different, as e.g. English and Japanese). Any criteria for estimations relating that 3rd language, perhaps x2 / x3 efforts required for localization testing of common language?
Which approach is better (or easier to explain) – %% based on overall functional testing efforts OR based on the approximate number of separate web portal pages?

At the moment the following makes sense for me:

5% of overall testing efforts (i.e. about 75 hrs) for common language localization testing;
Approx. 10-15%, i.e. about 200 hrs for UNcommon language localization testing.

For the record – web portal will have about 120-140 different types of pages that should have localized elements.

Any suggestions / help / ideas / approach (as best – based on real experience / cases) are highly appreciated!

P.S. no sample link available – it’s requirements refining stage.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) is crucial for businesses to manage and protect sensitive data in today’s complex IT environments. As enterprises adopt cloud-native technologies and AI/ML solutions, DSPM helps safeguard data from potential breaches by automating data discovery, classification, and risk assessment. It also ensures compliance with industry regulations like GDPR and HIPAA. The blog also discusses how DSPM can protect your business from evolving threats while enhancing your data security posture.
The post Why Your Business Needs Data Security Posture Management ? first appeared on TestingXperts.

The growth of large language models has created great opportunities. But we must make sure to build AI in a way that is ethical, so we can use it correctly. This is where Guardrails AI plays a role. This new platform aims to create a safer and more trustworthy AI environment. They do this by
The post Exploring Guardrails AI for Ethical AI Development appeared first on Codoid.

Postman is an extremely popular API client designed to make it easier to test your APIs, while Bruno is the AI-powered platform that possesses advanced capabilities of testing APIs. Comparing Postman vs. Bruno, Postman would have a focus on manual testing and automation with the strong interface for developers to manually configure, test, and automate
The post Postman vs Bruno: A Detailed Comparison appeared first on Codoid.

The coding world understands artificial intelligence. A big way AI helps is in code review. Cursor AI is the best way for developers to get help, no matter how skilled they are. It is not just another tool; it acts like a smart partner who can “chat” about your project well. This includes knowing the
The post Beginner’s Guide: Mastering AI Code Review with Cursor AI appeared first on Codoid.