Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Designing For TV: Principles, Patterns And Practical Guidance (Part 2)

      September 5, 2025

      Neo4j introduces new graph architecture that allows operational and analytics workloads to be run together

      September 5, 2025

      Beyond the benchmarks: Understanding the coding personalities of different LLMs

      September 5, 2025

      Top 10 Use Cases of Vibe Coding in Large-Scale Node.js Applications

      September 3, 2025

      Building smarter interactions with MCP elicitation: From clunky tool calls to seamless user experiences

      September 4, 2025

      From Zero to MCP: Simplifying AI Integrations with xmcp

      September 4, 2025

      Distribution Release: Linux Mint 22.2

      September 4, 2025

      Coded Smorgasbord: Basically, a Smorgasbord

      September 4, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Drupal 11’s AI Features: What They Actually Mean for Your Team

      September 5, 2025
      Recent

      Drupal 11’s AI Features: What They Actually Mean for Your Team

      September 5, 2025

      Why Data Governance Matters More Than Ever in 2025?

      September 5, 2025

      Perficient Included in the IDC Market Glance for Digital Business Professional Services, 3Q25

      September 5, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      How DevOps Teams Are Redefining Reliability with NixOS and OSTree-Powered Linux

      September 5, 2025
      Recent

      How DevOps Teams Are Redefining Reliability with NixOS and OSTree-Powered Linux

      September 5, 2025

      Distribution Release: Linux Mint 22.2

      September 4, 2025

      ‘Cronos: The New Dawn’ was by far my favorite experience at Gamescom 2025 — Bloober might have cooked an Xbox / PC horror masterpiece

      September 4, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Security»Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)»CVE-2025-38351 – KVM Hyper-V Canonical GVA Vulnerability

    CVE-2025-38351 – KVM Hyper-V Canonical GVA Vulnerability

    July 19, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-38351

    Published : July 19, 2025, 12:15 p.m. | 11 hours, 38 minutes ago

    Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

    KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush

    In KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercalls
    HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EX
    allow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB.
    For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposed
    to be invalidated.

    However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently no
    filtering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations of
    INVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD’s INVLPGA silently ignores
    non-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel’s INVVPID explicitly
    signals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error():

    invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000
    WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482
    invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel]
    Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse
    CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary)
    RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel]
    Call Trace:
    vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel]
    kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm]
    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm]

    Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition’s
    GVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether this
    ruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make that
    assumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms “real” Hyper-V interprets
    the specification in the same way.

    Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoid
    tripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out “bad”
    GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the only
    downside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing so
    is suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLB
    flushes for non-canonical addresses.

    Severity: 0.0 | NA

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    Source: Read More

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleCVE-2025-7817 – PHPGurukul Apartment Visitors Management System Cross-Site Scripting
    Next Article CVE-2015-10139 – WPLMS WordPress Privilege Escalation

    Related Posts

    Development

    Critical Linux UDisks Daemon Vulnerability (CVE-2025-8067) Exposes Privileged Data to Local Attackers

    September 5, 2025
    Development

    Google Slapped with $381 Million Fine in France Over Gmail Ads, Cookie Consent Missteps

    September 5, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Affordable 4o Image API for Fast Image Generation

    Web Development

    CVE-2025-7028 – Apache Software SMI Handler Pointer Dereference Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2013-10048 – D-Link Router OS Command Injection Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-6871 – SourceCodester Simple Company Website SQL Injection

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-32960 – CUBA REST API Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

    April 22, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-32960

    Published : April 22, 2025, 6:16 p.m. | 31 minutes ago

    Description : The CUBA REST API add-on performs operations on data and entities. Prior to version 7.2.7, the input parameter, which consists of a file path and name, can be manipulated to return the Content-Type header with text/html if the name part ends with .html. This could allow malicious JavaScript code to be executed in the browser. For a successful attack, a malicious file needs to be uploaded beforehand. This issue has been patched in version 7.2.7. A workaround is provided on the Jmix documentation website.

    Severity: 6.4 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    LitePub is a lightweight static blog generator

    June 9, 2025

    The need for speed: Why organizations are turning to rapid, trustworthy MDR

    August 22, 2025

    The Alters PC review: I’m rethinking my own life paths after falling in love with a sci-fi game

    June 12, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.