Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      10 Top Node.js Development Companies for Enterprise-Scale Projects (2025-2026 Ranked & Reviewed)

      July 4, 2025

      12 Must-Know Cost Factors When Hiring Node.js Developers for Your Enterprise

      July 4, 2025

      Mirantis reveals Lens Prism, an AI copilot for operating Kubernetes clusters

      July 3, 2025

      Avoid these common platform engineering mistakes

      July 3, 2025

      Just days after joining Game Pass, the Xbox PC edition of Call of Duty: WW2 is taken offline for “an issue”

      July 5, 2025

      Xbox layoffs and game cuts wreak havoc on talented developers and the company’s future portfolio — Weekend discussion 💬

      July 5, 2025

      Microsoft plans to revamp Recall in Windows 11 with these new features

      July 5, 2025

      This 4K OLED monitor has stereo speakers that follow you — but it’s missing something “imPORTant”

      July 5, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Flaget – new small 5kB CLI argument parser

      July 5, 2025
      Recent

      Flaget – new small 5kB CLI argument parser

      July 5, 2025

      The dog days of JavaScript summer

      July 4, 2025

      Databricks Lakebase – Database Branching in Action

      July 4, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Just days after joining Game Pass, the Xbox PC edition of Call of Duty: WW2 is taken offline for “an issue”

      July 5, 2025
      Recent

      Just days after joining Game Pass, the Xbox PC edition of Call of Duty: WW2 is taken offline for “an issue”

      July 5, 2025

      Xbox layoffs and game cuts wreak havoc on talented developers and the company’s future portfolio — Weekend discussion 💬

      July 5, 2025

      Microsoft plans to revamp Recall in Windows 11 with these new features

      July 5, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Security»Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)»CVE-2025-52833 – Designthemes LMS SQL Injection

    CVE-2025-52833 – Designthemes LMS SQL Injection

    July 4, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-52833

    Published : July 4, 2025, 12:15 p.m. | 2 hours, 44 minutes ago

    Description : Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’) vulnerability in designthemes LMS allows SQL Injection. This issue affects LMS: from n/a through 9.1.

    Severity: 9.3 | CRITICAL

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    Source: Read More

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleCVE-2025-6056 – Ergon Informatik AG Airlock IAM Information Disclosure
    Next Article CVE-2025-52832 – “WPO-HR NGG Smart Image Search SQL Injection”

    Related Posts

    Development

    Citrix Releases Emergency Patches for Actively Exploited CVE-2025-6543 in NetScaler ADC

    July 5, 2025
    Development

    CISA Adds 3 Flaws to KEV Catalog, Impacting AMI MegaRAC, D-Link, Fortinet

    July 5, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Revisiting Image Maps

    News & Updates

    CVE-2025-5358 – “PHPGurukul/Campcodes Cyber Cafe Management System SQL Injection Vulnerability”

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Rilasciato Libreboot 25.06: Il Firmware BIOS/UEFI Open Source Aggiunge Supporto per Nuove Periferiche

    Linux

    It’s time to replace your Windows 10 PC — these AI laptops with all-day battery life start at $599 for a limited time

    News & Updates

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-37827 – Here is a title for the vulnerability: “btrfs: RAID1 Profile Write Pointer Offset Mismatch NULL Pointer Dereference”

    May 8, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-37827

    Published : May 8, 2025, 7:15 a.m. | 58 minutes ago

    Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

    btrfs: zoned: return EIO on RAID1 block group write pointer mismatch

    There was a bug report about a NULL pointer dereference in
    __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned() that ultimately happens because a
    conversion from the default metadata profile DUP to a RAID1 profile on two
    disks.

    The stack trace has the following signature:

    BTRFS error (device sdc): zoned: write pointer offset mismatch of zones in raid1 profile
    BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000058
    #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
    #PF: error_code(0x0000) – not-present page
    PGD 0 P4D 0
    Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
    RIP: 0010:__btrfs_add_free_space_zoned.isra.0+0x61/0x1a0
    RSP: 0018:ffffa236b6f3f6d0 EFLAGS: 00010246
    RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96c8132f3400 RCX: 0000000000000001
    RDX: 0000000010000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff96c8132f3410
    RBP: 0000000010000000 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000000
    R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 0000000000000000
    R13: ffff96c758f65a40 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 000011aac0000000
    FS: 00007fdab1cb2900(0000) GS:ffff96e60ca00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
    CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    CR2: 0000000000000058 CR3: 00000001a05ae000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
    Call Trace:

    ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
    ? page_fault_oops+0x15c/0x2f0
    ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180
    ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
    ? __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned.isra.0+0x61/0x1a0
    btrfs_add_free_space_async_trimmed+0x34/0x40
    btrfs_add_new_free_space+0x107/0x120
    btrfs_make_block_group+0x104/0x2b0
    btrfs_create_chunk+0x977/0xf20
    btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x174/0x510
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1b1/0x230
    btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x9e/0x410
    btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3f/0x130
    btrfs_balance+0x8ac/0x12b0
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x14c/0x3e0
    btrfs_ioctl+0x2686/0x2a80
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? ioctl_has_perm.constprop.0.isra.0+0xd2/0x120
    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xc0
    do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? __memcg_slab_free_hook+0x11a/0x170
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? kmem_cache_free+0x3f0/0x450
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x10/0x210
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160
    ? sysfs_emit+0xaf/0xc0
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? seq_read_iter+0x207/0x460
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? vfs_read+0x29c/0x370
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x10/0x210
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160
    ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
    ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
    RIP: 0033:0x7fdab1e0ca6d
    RSP: 002b:00007ffeb2b60c80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
    RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fdab1e0ca6d
    RDX: 00007ffeb2b60d80 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
    RBP: 00007ffeb2b60cd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000013
    R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
    R13: 00007ffeb2b6343b R14: 00007ffeb2b60d80 R15: 0000000000000001

    CR2: 0000000000000058
    —[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]—

    The 1st line is the most interesting here:

    BTRFS error (device sdc): zoned: write pointer offset mismatch of zones in raid1 profile

    When a RAID1 block-group is created and a write pointer mismatch between
    the disks in the RAID set is detected, btrfs sets the alloc_offset to the
    length of the block group marking it as full. Afterwards the code expects
    that a balance operation will evacuate the data in this block-group and
    repair the problems.

    But before this is possible, the new space of this block-group will be
    accounted in the free space cache. But in __btrfs_
    —truncated—

    Severity: 0.0 | NA

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CodeSOD: A Highly Paid Field

    June 30, 2025

    CVE-2025-45428 – Tenda AC9 Stack Overflow Vulnerability

    April 23, 2025

    Perficient Recognized for Salesforce Expertise: Helping Businesses Thrive

    April 17, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.