Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      The Psychology Of Color In UX Design And Digital Products

      August 15, 2025

      This week in AI dev tools: Claude Sonnet 4’s larger context window, ChatGPT updates, and more (August 15, 2025)

      August 15, 2025

      Sentry launches MCP monitoring tool

      August 14, 2025

      10 Benefits of Hiring a React.js Development Company (2025–2026 Edition)

      August 13, 2025

      Your smart home device just got a performance and security boost for free

      August 18, 2025

      Ultrahuman brings advanced cycle and ovulation tracking to its smart ring

      August 18, 2025

      DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 1135

      August 17, 2025

      14 secret phone codes that unlock hidden features on your Android and iPhone

      August 17, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Air Quality Prediction System using Python ML

      August 17, 2025
      Recent

      Air Quality Prediction System using Python ML

      August 17, 2025

      AI’s Hidden Thirst: The Water Behind Tech

      August 16, 2025

      Minesweeper game in 100 lines of pure JavaScript – easy tutorial

      August 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 1135

      August 17, 2025
      Recent

      DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 1135

      August 17, 2025

      Ubuntu’s New “Dangerous” Daily Builds – What Are They?

      August 17, 2025

      gofmt – formats Go programs

      August 17, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Trust but Verify: The Curious Case of AI Hallucinations

    Trust but Verify: The Curious Case of AI Hallucinations

    July 2, 2025

    AI is no longer the future; it is happening. Every other technology faces issues during its development phase, and AI is no exception. Have you ever asked an AI a question and received an answer that sounded perfectly confident, only to find out it was completely wrong? That is not a glitch; it is called hallucination in the world of AI.

    What Are AI Hallucinations?

    An AI hallucination occurs when a model produces content that seems accurate but is incorrect, fabricated, illogical, or nonsensical. The result might appear correct, but it’s simply not true, deviating from the fact.

    File 0000000009d461f7b254ed9fff3e8380

    Why do AI Hallucinations Occur?

    To understand AI hallucinations, we need to take a look under the hood at how these models are designed, trained, and deployed for customer use.

    • Language prediction, not reasoning: Certain generative AIs are just trained to predict the next word in a sentence based on patterns in massive text datasets.
    • No awareness: These models lack understanding, but they can only mimic.
    • Gaps in training data: If a model has not been exposed to sufficient reliable information, if the training data is biased, or if it has been trained with very limited data, the result may deviate from the actual truth.
    • Overconfidence: AI models are optimized for fluency and clarity, which can lead them to present wrong answers in an authoritative tone.

    Understand with a Real-World Example

    Let us consider the following example. Here, the user asks AI a question and receives a result, then rephrases the question to maintain the same meaning, but this time, AI generates a different answer in contradiction to the previous one. This inconsistency and lack of clarity lead to AI hallucination.

    The user asks, “Is Pluto a planet?”

    AI says, “Yes, Pluto is the 9th planet.”

    The user rephrases the question and asks again, and AI says, “No, Pluto is not a planet since it does not clear its orbital path of other debris.”

    Hal3

    AI can hallucinate in terms of fake citations on websites, books, legal or research documents, historical inaccuracies, visual errors in image generation, and contradictory responses, among other issues. In critical fields like banking, healthcare, law, or education, such hallucinations can be lethal.

    How to Spot an AI Hallucination

    • Check with external authentic sources: If something seems right but still triggers ambiguity, perform a fact-check with authenticated sources, either online or offline.
    • Look for vague claims, redundant content, or generic language. If the results are delivered with extreme confidence with oddly precise numbers, it could be a red flag.
    • Visit references: If an article or quote is cited, visit the referenced site personally to see if it exists.

    How to Mitigate AI Hallucinations

    Mitigating AI hallucination involves technical strategies, human oversight, and enhanced system design.

    Hal4

    Technical Strategies to Reduce AI Hallucinations

    1. Grounding in Reliable Sources

    • Involving RAG: It is known as the retrieval-augmented generation approach, used in LLM and NLP. Using this, the machine’s output can be optimized to utilize a retrieval system that refers to an authoritative knowledge data source before producing the result.
    • Using APIs: Build external APIs that can query verified external resources or any domain-specific resource in real-time and generate results.
    • Guardrails: Building safeguards and including refusal mechanisms when the model is unsure about the context. It can validate the output of the machine and make corrections.

    2. Fine-Tuning with Quality Data

    • We need to train and then fine-tune the model with an extensive amount of data. Fine-tuning the LLM model can enhance the machine’s performance.

    3. Prompt Engineering

    • Use properly crafted prompts to enable the model to interpret and understand them, generating factual results.

    Human Oversight Can Decrease AI Hallucinations

    1.    Fact-Checking

    • Keep humans in the loop for manually verifying the results generated by an AI model. This can help reduce any false information, which is highly critical in domains such as medical, legal, and financial.

    2. User Feedback Loops

    • Designing the model to get feedback from the users in terms of emojis, suggestions, comparison between two responses, etc.
    • Use reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve truthfulness.

    System Design Best Practices to Mitigate AI Hallucinations

    1.     Audit Trails

    • Transparency is key; all significant steps taken to design the model, including all sources and references, should be documented. This ensures compliance and accountability.

    2. Confidence Indicators

    • Show confidence scores or highlight potentially uncertain outputs to users. A confidence indicator is generally a score that indicates how specific the AI is of the result it has produced, based on which the user can decide whether to rely on or deny it.

    3.     Regular Evaluation

    • Continuously evaluate the model using hallucination tests on various datasets.

    4.     Use Domain-Specific Models

    • Smaller, domain-specific models trained on exclusive data that is authorized can perform well in terms of accuracy.

    Conclusion

    Fluency cannot be equated with accuracy. As powerful as these tools are, we still require human intervention to maintain their credibility and reliability. The next time you encounter an AI hallucination, be sure to fact-check and appreciate the intriguing complexity of machine-generated imagination.

    References

    Why IT needs a framework for responsible agentic AI – The Economic Times

    Reducing hallucinations in large language models with custom intervention using Amazon Bedrock Agents | Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleFrom Flow to Fabric: Connecting Power Automate to Microsoft Fabric
    Next Article Opera 120 brings built-in translation and smarter split screen

    Related Posts

    Artificial Intelligence

    Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Smoothing: A 100-AV Highway Deployment

    August 18, 2025
    Repurposing Protein Folding Models for Generation with Latent Diffusion
    Artificial Intelligence

    Repurposing Protein Folding Models for Generation with Latent Diffusion

    August 18, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-255H Running Linux: Power Consumption

    Linux

    CVE-2013-10065 – Sysax Multi-Server SSH Denial-of-Service Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    You’ll hate Microsoft’s new Outlook less — after facing an annoying Outlook Classic bug cranking CPU usage to 50% in Windows 11 when typing

    News & Updates

    Smashing Security podcast #424: Surveillance, spyware, and self-driving snafus

    Development

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-53097 – Roo Code Schema Fetching File Read and Write Vulnerability

    June 27, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-53097

    Published : June 27, 2025, 10:15 p.m. | 4 hours, 59 minutes ago

    Description : Roo Code is an AI-powered autonomous coding agent. Prior to version 3.20.3, there was an issue where the Roo Code agent’s `search_files` tool did not respect the setting to disable reads outside of the VS Code workspace. This means that an attacker who was able to inject a prompt into the agent could potentially read a sensitive file and then write the information to a JSON schema. Users have the option to disable schema fetching in VS Code, but the feature is enabled by default. For users with this feature enabled, writing to the schema would trigger a network request without the user having a chance to deny. This issue is of moderate severity, since it requires the attacker to already be able to submit prompts to the agent. Version 3.20.3 fixed the issue where `search_files` did not respect the setting to limit it to the workspace. This reduces the scope of the damage if an attacker is able to take control of the agent through prompt injection or another vector.

    Severity: 5.9 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    The Alters: Release date, mechanics, and everything else you need to know

    June 2, 2025
    Rilasciata FunOS 25.04: la Distribuzione GNU/Linux Leggera e Moderna Basata su Ubuntu 25.04

    Rilasciata FunOS 25.04: la Distribuzione GNU/Linux Leggera e Moderna Basata su Ubuntu 25.04

    April 21, 2025

    Scattered Spider Hacker Arrests Halt Attacks, But Copycat Threats Sustain Security Pressure

    July 31, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.