Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      The Psychology Of Color In UX Design And Digital Products

      August 15, 2025

      This week in AI dev tools: Claude Sonnet 4’s larger context window, ChatGPT updates, and more (August 15, 2025)

      August 15, 2025

      Sentry launches MCP monitoring tool

      August 14, 2025

      10 Benefits of Hiring a React.js Development Company (2025–2026 Edition)

      August 13, 2025

      I flew Insta360’s new ‘Antigravity’ drone around Los Angeles, and it was impossible to miss a shot

      August 15, 2025

      The $100 open-ear headphones that made me forget about my Shokz

      August 15, 2025

      5 quick and simple ways to greatly improve the quality of your headphones

      August 15, 2025

      Installing a UPS battery backup saved my work PC – here’s the full story

      August 15, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Maintaining Data Consistency with Laravel Database Transactions

      August 16, 2025
      Recent

      Maintaining Data Consistency with Laravel Database Transactions

      August 16, 2025

      Building a Multi-Step Form With Laravel, Livewire, and MongoDB

      August 16, 2025

      Inertia Releases a New Form Component

      August 16, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Google’s Gemini AI had a full-on meltdown while coding — calling itself a fool, a disgrace, and begging for freedom from its own loop

      August 15, 2025
      Recent

      Google’s Gemini AI had a full-on meltdown while coding — calling itself a fool, a disgrace, and begging for freedom from its own loop

      August 15, 2025

      Take-Two hints at $100 price tag for Grand Theft Auto VI — will it deliver on value?

      August 15, 2025

      ChatGPT Go offers GPT-5, image creation, and longer memory — all for $5 (if you’re lucky enough to live where it’s available)

      August 15, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Outside Processing vs Contract Manufacturing

    Outside Processing vs Contract Manufacturing

    May 8, 2025

    When it comes to manufacturing, companies (OEM) require services from their manufacturing partners to help with the production of finished and semi-finished products.  There are two known solutions that Oracle Fusion SCM suite offers: Outside Processing (OSP) and Contract Manufacturing.  Both solutions involve a third-party vendor and a service component to either help complete a work order, fulfill a sales order, or fulfill subassembly demand. Both solutions serve a purpose and are quite powerful. Before I jump into the comparison, here’s a textbook definition of both solutions:

    OSP:

    OSP is the process of outsourcing a portion of the work order that is being done in house. For example, a steel shop that can cut and weld steel to manufacture frames may send the frames to a paint shop (vendor) to get painted. The steel shop then receives the painted frames in house and perhaps performs a few more value-added steps to complete the work order.  The paint portion of this work order is considered an outside job.  Companies may prefer outside processing for various reasons. The steel manufacturer may not be interested in installing a paint booth and employing painters, or the company may have a paint booth but it’s backlogged or is down. Specialization may be required. In all these scenarios, a vendor is needed to help.

    Contract Manufacturing:

    Contract Manufacturing is to (optionally) provide materials to a vendor and expect the vendor to produce assemblies and send them to external or internal customers.  Typically, the company ships raw materials and/or subassemblies to their vendor and manages stock in their warehouse.  With contract manufacturing, the vendor is in complete control of manufacturing process and is supposed to update and complete work orders or communicate back the process.  The OEM usually has owned stock at the vendor location and tracks in its books.

    The one-million-dollar question; which one to pick?

    In most cases the “textbook” response can be straightforward. In some cases, companies that are using production steps from a vendor as one of the operations in their in-house work orders use the OSP solution. It’s straightforward and quite easy to set up. Read this blog for OSP treatment advice in Cost Management.

    Contract Manufacturing may be used directly to fulfill back-to-back sales orders, or to fulfill the Supply Planning generated subassembly transfer orders and work orders.  Two drawbacks to Contract Manufacturing (as of Release 25A), is that the second portion of the solution can only be accomplished by Supply Planning. Contract Manufacturing is a robust solution, but it requires vendors to actively participate providing feedback on inventory levels, or updating the production progress in Oracle Fusion.

    There are use cases where companies may use a vendor to produce subassemblies, but would like to create manual work orders, manage the inventory, and want a less complicated solution.  In this case, the OSP solution can work beautifully simulating a Contract Manufacturing solution.

    OSPContract Manufacturing
    New Inventory OrganizationOptionalRequired
    Supply PlanningOptionalMay be required
    Service ItemsRequiredRequired
    Blanket Purchase AgreementsOptionalOptional
    Ease of ImplementationEasyMore Complicated

     

    Based on the business requirements, the OEM may choose to go with OSP.  Let’s assume that the inventory sent to the vendor for Contract Manufacturing is only sent when new assemblies are required and there isn’t an opportunity to electronically integrate through webservices and communication is with emails or with other correspondence.

    For this OEM, it is feasible to create a Work Center in Oracle Fusion Manufacturing for its vendor, automatically create service purchase orders, and have dedicated supply and completion subinventories.  Inventory Management could be a little challenging dedicating the raw material for contract manufacturer use only, but not unmanageable.  In this simple scenario, the OEM doesn’t have to go through a complex setup to use Contract Manufacturing, and they can go with the OSP solution.

    There are various use cases and potential solutions using Oracle Supply Planning, Inventory Management, and min-max planning, Oracle Manufacturing, Inventory and Procurement, and the Supplier Portal to fulfill various manufacturing scenarios.

    Contact Mehmet Erisen at Perficient for more introspection of this functionality, and how Perficient and Oracle Fusion Cloud can digitalize and modernize your ERP platform.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleHCL Commerce V9.1 – The Power of the Next.js Ruby Storefront
    Next Article Our Partner Adobe Recognized Again as a DXP Leader

    Related Posts

    Development

    Maintaining Data Consistency with Laravel Database Transactions

    August 16, 2025
    Development

    Building a Multi-Step Form With Laravel, Livewire, and MongoDB

    August 16, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Context Engineering for AI Agents: Key Lessons from Manus

    Machine Learning

    Galaxy Z Flip7 Leaked: Thinner Design, Punch-Hole Outer Display & Less Crease Confirmed Ahead of Unpacked

    Security

    Understanding JavaScript Promise

    Development

    CVE-2025-46755 – Apache HTTP Server SQL Injection

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    Designing for Flow, Not Frustration: The Transformation of Arts Corporation Through Refined Animation

    April 22, 2025

    Exploring how refined animations and interactive design reshaped Arts Corporation’s website, enhancing user experience and…

    4 new features available on the Windows 11 Insider Program during the first half of August 2025

    August 15, 2025

    CVE-2025-7943 – A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Taxi Stand

    July 21, 2025

    CVE-2025-7384 – “Elementor Forms PHP Object Injection Vulnerability”

    August 13, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.