Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Designing For TV: Principles, Patterns And Practical Guidance (Part 2)

      September 5, 2025

      Neo4j introduces new graph architecture that allows operational and analytics workloads to be run together

      September 5, 2025

      Beyond the benchmarks: Understanding the coding personalities of different LLMs

      September 5, 2025

      Top 10 Use Cases of Vibe Coding in Large-Scale Node.js Applications

      September 3, 2025

      Building smarter interactions with MCP elicitation: From clunky tool calls to seamless user experiences

      September 4, 2025

      From Zero to MCP: Simplifying AI Integrations with xmcp

      September 4, 2025

      Distribution Release: Linux Mint 22.2

      September 4, 2025

      Coded Smorgasbord: Basically, a Smorgasbord

      September 4, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Drupal 11’s AI Features: What They Actually Mean for Your Team

      September 5, 2025
      Recent

      Drupal 11’s AI Features: What They Actually Mean for Your Team

      September 5, 2025

      Why Data Governance Matters More Than Ever in 2025?

      September 5, 2025

      Perficient Included in the IDC Market Glance for Digital Business Professional Services, 3Q25

      September 5, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      How DevOps Teams Are Redefining Reliability with NixOS and OSTree-Powered Linux

      September 5, 2025
      Recent

      How DevOps Teams Are Redefining Reliability with NixOS and OSTree-Powered Linux

      September 5, 2025

      Distribution Release: Linux Mint 22.2

      September 4, 2025

      ‘Cronos: The New Dawn’ was by far my favorite experience at Gamescom 2025 — Bloober might have cooked an Xbox / PC horror masterpiece

      September 4, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Machine Learning»Model Compression Without Compromise: Loop-Residual Neural Networks Show Comparable Results to Larger GPT-2 Variants Using Iterative Refinement

    Model Compression Without Compromise: Loop-Residual Neural Networks Show Comparable Results to Larger GPT-2 Variants Using Iterative Refinement

    April 16, 2025

    The transformer architecture has revolutionized natural language processing, enabling models like GPT to predict the next token in a sequence efficiently. However, these models suffer from a fundamental limitation of performing a one-pass projection of all previous tokens to predict the next token, which restricts their capacity for iterative refinement. Transformers apply constant computational effort regardless of the complexity or ambiguity of the predicted token, lacking mechanisms to reconsider or refine their predictions. Traditional neural networks, including transformers, map input sequences to predict in a single forward pass, processing inputs through multiple layers to refine internal representations.

    Universal Transformers introduced the recurrent application of transformer layers to capture short-term and long-term dependencies by iteratively refining representations. However, experiments were limited to smaller models and datasets rather than large-scale language models like GPT-2. Adaptive Computation Time models allowed dynamic determination of computational steps per input but are mainly applied to simple RNN architectures and tested on small-scale tasks without using transformer architecture or large-scale pretraining. Depth-Adaptive Transformers adjusted network depth based on input, enabling dynamic inference by selecting the number of layers to apply per input sequence. However, these approaches lack the predictive residual design found in more advanced architectures.

    Researchers from HKU have proposed a novel Loop-Residual Neural Network that revisits input multiple times, refining predictions by iteratively looping over a subset of the model with residual connections. It improves transformer performance with longer inference times using a novel loop architecture with residual prediction. This approach works effectively for large neural networks without requiring extra training data, extending the model’s approximation capacity. Its effectiveness is shown through experiments comparing standard GPT-2 versions with Loop-Residual models. Notably, their GPT-2-81M model achieves a validation loss of 3.11 on the OpenWebText dataset, comparable to the GPT-2-124M model’s loss of 3.12.

    The Loop-Residual involves two experiments. First, a Loop-Residual GPT-2 model with 81M parameters (GPT2-81M) is compared with the GPT-2 model with 124M parameters (GPT2-124M). While GPT2-124M consists of 12 transformer layers as the baseline, the Loop-Residual GPT2-81M uses 6 loops over 6 transformer layers. The second experiment compares a Loop-Residual GPT-2 with 45M parameters (GPT2-45M) to a Lite GPT-2 model of identical size (GPT2-45M-Lite). The GPT2-45M-Lite features a single transformer block layer for one-pass prediction, while the Loop-Residual version loops twice over a single transformer block. Both experiments use the OpenWebText dataset with measured training epoch times of 150ms for GPT2-45M-Lite, 177ms for Loop-Residual GPT2-45M, and 1,377ms for GPT2-81M.

    In the first experiment, the Loop-Residual GPT2-81M model achieves a validation loss of 3.11 on the OpenWebText dataset, comparable to the GPT2-124M model’s loss of 3.12. This result is significant because the Loop-Residual model uses 35% fewer parameters and half the number of unique layers compared to the GPT2-124M model. This shows that iterative refinement through the loop-residual mechanism enhances the model’s approximation capacity. In the second experiment, the Loop-Residual model achieves a validation loss of 3.67 compared to 3.98 and a training loss of 3.65 compared to 3.96. By looping twice over a single transformer block, the model effectively simulates a deeper network, resulting in substantial performance gains over the one-pass baseline without increasing model size.

    In conclusion, researchers introduced the Loop-Residual Neural Network, which enables smaller neural network models to achieve better results on lower-end devices by utilizing longer inference times through iterative refinement. This method captures complex patterns and dependencies more effectively than conventional one-pass models. Experiments show that Loop-Residual models can achieve improved performance over baseline models of the same size and comparable performance to larger models with fewer parameters. The future direction includes new possibilities for neural network architectures, especially for tasks that benefit from deeper computational reasoning on resource-constrained devices.


    Here is the Paper. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and join our Telegram Channel and LinkedIn Group. Don’t Forget to join our 90k+ ML SubReddit.

    🔥 [Register Now] miniCON Virtual Conference on AGENTIC AI: FREE REGISTRATION + Certificate of Attendance + 4 Hour Short Event (May 21, 9 am- 1 pm PST) + Hands on Workshop

    The post Model Compression Without Compromise: Loop-Residual Neural Networks Show Comparable Results to Larger GPT-2 Variants Using Iterative Refinement appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleMIT Researchers Introduce DISCIPL: A Self-Steering Framework Using Planner and Follower Language Models for Efficient Constrained Generation and Reasoning
    Next Article Mailmodo Free Email Signature Generator

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    How to Evaluate Jailbreak Methods: A Case Study with the StrongREJECT Benchmark

    September 3, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Announcing the new cluster creation experience for Amazon SageMaker HyperPod

    September 3, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Raspberry Pi OS – Debian-based distro

    Linux

    Ten Forward – control a NAT-PMP gateway

    Linux

    CVE-2025-52555 – Ceph File System Root Privilege Escalation

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Chinese spy crew appears to be preparing for conflict by backdooring 75+ critical orgs

    Security

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-4770 – PHPGurukul Park Ticketing Management System SQL Injection Vulnerability

    May 16, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-4770

    Published : May 16, 2025, 11:15 a.m. | 1 hour, 7 minutes ago

    Description : A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in PHPGurukul Park Ticketing Management System 2.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /view-normal-ticket.php. The manipulation of the argument viewid leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

    Severity: 6.3 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CVE-2025-7468 – “Tenda FH1201 HTTP POST Request Handler Buffer Overflow”

    July 12, 2025

    Threat Report H2 2024: Infostealer shakeup, new attack vector for mobile, and Nomani

    April 10, 2025

    CVE-2025-35471 – Conda Forge OpenSSL-Feedstock Local Privilege Escalation

    May 13, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.