Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      June 5, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      June 5, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      June 5, 2025

      In MCP era API discoverability is now more important than ever

      June 5, 2025

      Google’s DeepMind CEO lists 2 AGI existential risks to society keeping him up at night — but claims “today’s AI systems” don’t warrant a pause on development

      June 5, 2025

      Anthropic researchers say next-generation AI models will reduce humans to “meat robots” in a spectrum of crazy futures

      June 5, 2025

      Xbox just quietly added two of the best RPGs of all time to Game Pass

      June 5, 2025

      7 reasons The Division 2 is a game you should be playing in 2025

      June 5, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Mastering TypeScript: How Complex Should Your Types Be?

      June 5, 2025
      Recent

      Mastering TypeScript: How Complex Should Your Types Be?

      June 5, 2025

      IDMC – CDI Best Practices

      June 5, 2025

      PWC-IDMC Migration Gaps

      June 5, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Google’s DeepMind CEO lists 2 AGI existential risks to society keeping him up at night — but claims “today’s AI systems” don’t warrant a pause on development

      June 5, 2025
      Recent

      Google’s DeepMind CEO lists 2 AGI existential risks to society keeping him up at night — but claims “today’s AI systems” don’t warrant a pause on development

      June 5, 2025

      Anthropic researchers say next-generation AI models will reduce humans to “meat robots” in a spectrum of crazy futures

      June 5, 2025

      Xbox just quietly added two of the best RPGs of all time to Game Pass

      June 5, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Critical Flaws in Contec CMS8000 Allow Remote Code Execution and Patient Data Theft

    Critical Flaws in Contec CMS8000 Allow Remote Code Execution and Patient Data Theft

    January 31, 2025

    Vulnerabilities

    A new set of critical vulnerabilities has been identified in Contec Health’s CMS8000 Patient Monitor, posing significant cybersecurity and patient safety risks. These vulnerabilities, which have received a CVSS v4 base score of 9.3, allow for remote exploitation with low attack complexity. The security issues identified include an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability, a Hidden Functionality (Backdoor), and Privacy Leakage. These flaws could lead to remote code execution, unauthorized file uploads, and exposure of sensitive patient data.

    Both the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have issued safety communications addressing these risks, highlighting the potential for large-scale exploitation in healthcare environments.

    Background

    • Critical Infrastructure Sector: Healthcare and Public Health
    • Global Deployment: The CMS8000 Patient Monitor is used worldwide.
    • Manufacturer: Contec Health, headquartered in China.
    • Researcher: An anonymous security researcher reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.

    Risk Evaluation

    Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities can enable a malicious actor to remotely send specially crafted UDP requests, allowing them to write arbitrary data. This could result in remote code execution, unauthorized access to patient information, and even the ability to manipulate device functionality. Moreover, the device has been found to leak patient and sensor data to an unknown external network, further exacerbating security concerns.

    A particularly aspect of these vulnerabilities is that simultaneous exploitation of all affected devices within a shared network is possible. This increases the risk of coordinated cyberattacks that could compromise multiple patient monitors in a single healthcare facility.

    To mitigate these risks, both the FDA and CISA have released guidelines and fact sheets detailing the vulnerabilities and recommended security measures.

    Technical Details

    Affected Products

    The vulnerabilities affect the following firmware versions of the CMS8000 Patient Monitor:

    • smart3250-2.6.27-wlan2.1.7.cramfs
    • CMS7.820.075.08/0.74(0.75)
    • CMS7.820.120.01/0.93(0.95)
    • All firmware versions (CVE-2025-0626, CVE-2025-0683)

    Vulnerabilities Overview

    1. Out-of-Bounds Write (CWE-787)

    • CVE-2024-12248
    • Allows an attacker to send specially formatted UDP requests that write arbitrary data, potentially leading to remote code execution.
    • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 9.8
    • CVSS v4 Base Score: 9.3

    2. Hidden Functionality (Backdoor) (CWE-912)

    • CVE-2025-0626
    • The device sends remote access requests to a hard-coded IP address, bypassing network settings. This could allow unauthorized actors to upload and overwrite files on the monitor.
    • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 7.5
    • CVSS v4 Base Score: 7.7

    3. Privacy Leakage (CWE-359)

    • CVE-2025-0683
    • In default configuration, the monitor transmits plain-text patient data to a hard-coded public IP address, leading to potential exposure of confidential information.
    • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 5.9
    • CVSS v4 Base Score: 8.2

    Mitigation Measures

    Given the high severity of these vulnerabilities, the FDA and CISA strongly recommend removing affected CMS8000 Patient Monitors from networks until a secure patch is available. Additionally, organizations should implement the following security measures:

    • Restrict Network Exposure: Ensure all medical devices, including patient monitors, are not accessible from the internet.
    • Use Firewalls: Place affected devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.
    • Update Firewall Rules: Block unauthorized access to affected devices and external communication with unknown IP addresses.
    • Subnet Segmentation: Ensure medical devices are located on a separate, low-privilege network segment.
    • Source Equipment from Trusted Manufacturers: Avoid using rebranded or resold versions of the CMS8000 that may still contain vulnerabilities.

    CISA CSAF Repository & OASIS CSAF 2.0 Standard

    To enhance security automation and expedite mitigation efforts, CISA has made available security advisories in machine-readable format through its CSAF repository. This repository follows the OASIS CSAF 2.0 standard, allowing organizations to consume advisories in a structured manner and reduce response times.

    The OASIS CSAF Technical Committee developed CSAF as a standardized approach for sharing security advisories in a machine-readable format, facilitating faster remediation and improving overall cybersecurity resilience. Vendors and cybersecurity professionals are encouraged to leverage this resource to stay updated on security threats and vulnerabilities.

    Healthcare organizations must act swiftly to mitigate these risks by removing affected devices from their networks, implementing strict access controls, and leveraging cybersecurity best practices. Additionally, manufacturers must prioritize security updates and ensure the safety of critical medical devices.

    CISA and the FDA will continue to monitor the situation and provide updated security recommendations as necessary. Organizations are encouraged to stay vigilant and proactive in securing their medical infrastructure against emerging cyber threats.

    Source: Read More

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleWebsite Performance Optimization
    Next Article Top 5 AI-Powered Social Engineering Attacks

    Related Posts

    Security

    High-Severity Flaw in MIM Medical Imaging Software Allows Code Execution!

    June 5, 2025
    Security

    Amazon Alerts: High-Severity FreeRTOS-Plus-TCP Flaw Needs Immediate Patch!

    June 5, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Continue Reading

    How to Create Partitions in Linux Using fdisk Command

    Development

    T-Mobile launches high-speed home internet service – see if you can get it

    News & Updates

    Away From the Keyboard: Everton Agner, Staff Software Engineer

    Databases

    Specs and prices for Acer’s new AI PC gaming handhelds have been revealed — They’re a lot heftier than I expected

    News & Updates

    Highlights

    CVE-2024-22653 – Yasm NULL Pointer Dereference Vulnerability

    May 29, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2024-22653

    Published : May 29, 2025, 3:15 p.m. | 1 hour, 47 minutes ago

    Description : yasm commit 9defefae was discovered to contain a NULL pointer dereference via the yasm_section_bcs_append function at section.c.

    Severity: 4.8 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CVE-2025-48066 – Wire Webapp Local Data Deletion Failure

    May 22, 2025

    CVE-2025-3996 – TOTOLINK N150RT Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

    April 28, 2025

    Running NVIDIA NeMo 2.0 Framework on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod

    March 18, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.