Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      Sunshine And March Vibes (2025 Wallpapers Edition)

      May 20, 2025

      The Case For Minimal WordPress Setups: A Contrarian View On Theme Frameworks

      May 20, 2025

      How To Fix Largest Contentful Paint Issues With Subpart Analysis

      May 20, 2025

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      May 20, 2025

      GPT-5 should have a higher “degree of scientific certainty” than the current ChatGPT — but with less model switching

      May 20, 2025

      Elon Musk’s Grok 3 AI coming to Azure proves Satya Nadella’s allegiance isn’t to OpenAI, but to maximizing Microsoft’s profit gains by heeding consumer demands

      May 20, 2025

      One of the most promising open-world RPGs in years is releasing next week on Xbox and PC

      May 20, 2025

      NVIDIA’s latest driver fixes some big issues with DOOM: The Dark Ages

      May 20, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Community News: Latest PECL Releases (05.20.2025)

      May 20, 2025
      Recent

      Community News: Latest PECL Releases (05.20.2025)

      May 20, 2025

      Getting Started with Personalization in Sitecore XM Cloud: Enable, Extend, and Execute

      May 20, 2025

      Universal Design and Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD)

      May 20, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      GPT-5 should have a higher “degree of scientific certainty” than the current ChatGPT — but with less model switching

      May 20, 2025
      Recent

      GPT-5 should have a higher “degree of scientific certainty” than the current ChatGPT — but with less model switching

      May 20, 2025

      Elon Musk’s Grok 3 AI coming to Azure proves Satya Nadella’s allegiance isn’t to OpenAI, but to maximizing Microsoft’s profit gains by heeding consumer demands

      May 20, 2025

      One of the most promising open-world RPGs in years is releasing next week on Xbox and PC

      May 20, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Mitigating REST API Challenges with GraphQL Adoption

    Mitigating REST API Challenges with GraphQL Adoption

    June 25, 2024

    Let’s kickstart our discussion on GraphQL by delving into the shortcomings of REST API. After all, if REST API were flawless, GraphQL wouldn’t have been necessary.

    Challenges Inherent in REST API

    Over the years, it has become evident that there are significant challenges associated with REST, and these problems are :

    Fixed entity structure
    Request response only

    So let’s delve into these issues, starting with…

    Fixed entity structure

    This implies that in REST, the client lacks the ability to specify the specific parts of an entity it wishes to retrieve. Additionally, the structure of the returned entity is predetermined by the backend developer and cannot be customized on a per-query basis.

    Let’s understand with an example:

    With REST, there’s no mechanism to fetch only the required fields, resulting in the retrieval of the entire entity, thereby amplifying load times and network latency. This inefficiency is often observed in various organizations, prompting developers to craft specialized entity types tailored for specific queries.

    So that’s one of the issues with REST API: its limitation to support only fixed entity structures.

    Request response only

    REST API exclusively adheres to the request-response pattern. So, in the scenario where there’s a client and a service, the service exposes a REST API. The client sends a request to this REST API and subsequently receives a response, adhering to the request-response model. Nevertheless, modern web applications necessitate a broader spectrum of client-server communication methods.

    Let’s understand with an example:

    Take the case of Facebook: push notifications are increasingly valuable and widespread. To effectively adopt this model, the request-response pattern isn’t suitable. This is because we aim to push data from the service to the client rather than retrieving it as part of a request and response. Essentially, what we require is a mechanism for the service to send notifications to the client.

    How can we do that:

    We can achieve this through methods like polling, where periodic requests are sent to the service to check for new notifications, or by utilizing more advanced protocols like WebSockets. However, regardless of the implementation approach, incorporating this functionality with REST API is not inherent to the protocol and can be complex to implement.

    So, recognizing these two issues led to the realization that a new API type was necessary to address them: the fixed entity structure and the request-response limitation. This is where GraphQL comes into play.

    GraphQL APIs:

    GraphQL primarily functions as a specification rather than a singular implementation. It outlines the structure of data returned, operating in JSON format. It encompasses three types of operations, relies on a schema, and boasts cross-platform compatibility. So let’s go through all the characteristics of GraphQL APIs.

    Specification

    GraphQL delineates the semantics and components of a GraphQL API without furnishing concrete implementations. Various entities develop implementations in multiple languages, and the comprehensive specification of GraphQL can be found here.

    Defines a Structure of Data Returned

    GraphQL’s defining feature lies in its ability to structure the returned data, which is perhaps its most significant advantage. With GraphQL, we can precisely specify the desired parts of an entity to be returned and even request related entities as part of the query. Additionally, filtering can be specified directly within the query. This capability effectively resolves the issue of fixed entity structures, as GraphQL enables us to pinpoint the specific fields of interest within the data model.

    GraphQL API Architecture

    A GraphQL API is a robust tool for interacting with data stored in a graph database. Unlike traditional REST APIs, GraphQL optimizes data retrieval by modeling it in terms of nodes and edges, effectively representing objects and their relationships. This design allows developers to perform multiple operations on various nodes using just one HTTP request.

    Via HTTP/HTTPS requests, each GraphQL endpoint is dedicated to a specific operation (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE), streamlining client interactions with the database. Developers send requests, encapsulating essential data in the request body or query parameters, and receive an appropriate HTTP/HTTPS status code along with the requested data in response.

    For instance, imagine a server that holds data about authors, blog posts, and comments. In a typical REST API scenario, a client might have to issue three separate requests (/posts/abc, /authors/xyz, /posts/abc/comments) to fetch details concerning a specific blog post, its author, and comments.

    Conversely, a GraphQL API enables clients to make a single request that retrieves data from all three resources simultaneously. Additionally, clients can specify the exact fields they need, offering enhanced control over the structure of the response. This efficiency and flexibility are key factors driving the increasing adoption of GraphQL APIs in contemporary web development.

    References:

    GraphQL
    Introduction to the GraphQL.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleMultiple WordPress Plugins Compromised: Hackers Create Rogue Admin Accounts
    Next Article AWS Systems Manager (SSM)

    Related Posts

    Security

    Nmap 7.96 Launches with Lightning-Fast DNS and 612 Scripts

    May 20, 2025
    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-30193 – DNSdist TCP Stack Exhaustion Denial of Service Vulnerability

    May 20, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Hostinger

    Continue Reading

    U.S. Treasury Lifts Tornado Cash Sanctions Amid North Korea Money Laundering Probe

    Development

    Why people are mad at Figma

    Web Development

    Aligning Large Language Models with Diverse User Preferences Using Multifaceted System Messages: The JANUS Approach

    Development

    I found a laptop for creators that rivals the 16-inch MacBook Pro, but it costs half the price

    Development
    Hostinger

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-47828 – Lumi H5P Nodejs Library HTML Injection Vulnerability

    May 11, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-47828

    Published : May 11, 2025, 3:15 a.m. | 25 minutes ago

    Description : Lumi H5P-Nodejs-library before 9.3.3 omits a sanitizeHtml call for plain text strings.

    Severity: 6.4 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    The Role of ReactJS in Digital Transformation: Why Your Business Needs It

    April 18, 2025

    Building an On-Scroll 3D Circle Text Animation with Three.js and Shaders

    February 3, 2025

    Collective #879

    November 8, 2024
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.