Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      How To Prevent WordPress SQL Injection Attacks

      June 12, 2025

      Creating The “Moving Highlight” Navigation Bar With JavaScript And CSS

      June 11, 2025

      Databricks adds new tools like Lakebase, Lakeflow Designer, and Agent Bricks to better support building AI apps and agents in the enterprise

      June 11, 2025

      Zencoder launches end-to-end UI testing agent

      June 11, 2025

      NVIDIA chief rebuffs Anthropic’s AI slashing 50% of entry-level white collar jobs from Gen Z claim: “He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it.”

      June 12, 2025

      OpenAI shifts to Google for cloud computing support as Microsoft partnership falters, despite Sam Altman’s “compute-sufficient” claim

      June 12, 2025

      Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 now lets you rematch the game’s most brutal boss

      June 12, 2025

      The Alters PC review: I’m rethinking my own life paths after falling in love with a sci-fi game

      June 12, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      SVAR Svelte Filter: Visual Query Builder for Data-Driven Apps

      June 12, 2025
      Recent

      SVAR Svelte Filter: Visual Query Builder for Data-Driven Apps

      June 12, 2025

      Developing a Serverless Blogging Platform with AWS Lambda and Python

      June 12, 2025

      YAML files in DBT

      June 12, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      NVIDIA chief rebuffs Anthropic’s AI slashing 50% of entry-level white collar jobs from Gen Z claim: “He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it.”

      June 12, 2025
      Recent

      NVIDIA chief rebuffs Anthropic’s AI slashing 50% of entry-level white collar jobs from Gen Z claim: “He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it.”

      June 12, 2025

      OpenAI shifts to Google for cloud computing support as Microsoft partnership falters, despite Sam Altman’s “compute-sufficient” claim

      June 12, 2025

      Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 now lets you rematch the game’s most brutal boss

      June 12, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Machine Learning»How Much Do Language Models Really Memorize? Meta’s New Framework Defines Model Capacity at the Bit Level

    How Much Do Language Models Really Memorize? Meta’s New Framework Defines Model Capacity at the Bit Level

    June 11, 2025

    Introduction: The Challenge of Memorization in Language Models

    Modern language models face increasing scrutiny regarding their memorization behavior. With models such as an 8-billion parameter transformer trained on 15 trillion tokens, researchers question whether these models memorize their training data in a meaningful way. Common techniques, including data extraction and membership inference, fall short as they often fail to distinguish between memorization and generalization.

    Limitations of Existing Approaches

    Previous frameworks like extraction-based methods or differential privacy operate at the dataset level, not accounting for instance-specific memorization. Language modeling through compression and assessments of capacity through fact memorization (as in RNNs and quantized transformers) offer partial insight but lack scalability and precision, especially for deep transformer architectures.

    A Novel Approach to Measuring Memorization

    Researchers from FAIR at Meta, Google DeepMind, Cornell University, and NVIDIA have proposed a novel method for estimating how much a model “knows” about specific datapoints to measure the capacity of modern language models. They separate memorization into two components: unintended memorization, which represents the information a model contains about a dataset, and generalization, which captures the information about the true data-generation process. They calculate total memorization to provide accurate estimates of model capacity by removing generalization, showing that GPT family models have an approximate capacity of 3.6 bits-per-parameter. Researchers also developed a series of scaling laws that relate model capacity and data size to membership inference by training hundreds of transformer language models.

    Experimental Framework and Training Methodology

    Using the GPT-2 architecture, the team trained hundreds of models ranging from 100K to 20M parameters, varying depths (1-8 layers), and hidden sizes (32-512). Training involved:

    • 10^6 steps
    • Batch size: 2048
    • Precision: bfloat16
    • Hardware: Single A100 GPU

    These models were trained on both synthetic sequences and deduplicated 64-token text sequences from the FineWeb dataset. The experiments ensured minimal interference from generalization through careful dataset construction.

    Model Capacity Insights and Key Findings

    • Bits per parameter: Across configurations, models consistently stored between 3.5 and 3.6 bits/parameter.
    • Double descent: As training dataset size approaches model capacity, test loss initially decreases (overfitting), then improves again as models begin generalizing.
    • Precision impact: Training in float32 increases storage capacity slightly (to ~3.83 bpp) compared to bfloat16 (~3.51 bpp).

    Disentangling Memorization and Generalization

    Switching from synthetic to real-text datasets, the team observed:

    • Sample-level unintended memorization increases with parameter count.
    • Memorization decreases as training set size increases.
    • Accurate estimation of model memorization requires deduplication and reference to an oracle model for baseline compression rates.

    Membership Inference Scaling Laws

    The researchers modeled the success rate (F1 score) of loss-based membership inference as a function of the ratio between model capacity and dataset size. Key observations:

    • Membership inference becomes unreliable as datasets grow.
    • Predictive scaling laws remain accurate within 1-2% for models up to 1.5B parameters.

    Conclusion: A Better Understanding of Model Behavior

    This work establishes a principled framework for measuring memorization in language models. By introducing quantifiable metrics and scalable experiments, it deepens our understanding of how transformer models encode training data and draws a clear boundary between memorization and generalization. The resulting insights can guide future developments in model evaluation, privacy, and interpretability.


    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 99k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.

    ▶ Want to promote your product/webinar/service to 1 Million+ AI Engineers/Developers/Data Scientists/Architects/CTOs/CIOs? Lets Partner..

    The post How Much Do Language Models Really Memorize? Meta’s New Framework Defines Model Capacity at the Bit Level appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleNVIDIA Researchers Introduce Dynamic Memory Sparsification (DMS) for 8× KV Cache Compression in Transformer LLMs
    Next Article Supercharging Workflows with AI Agent and Copilot Development🚀

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    How to Evaluate Jailbreak Methods: A Case Study with the StrongREJECT Benchmark

    June 12, 2025
    Machine Learning

    CURE: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Co-Evolving Code and Unit Test Generation in LLMs

    June 12, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    CVE-2025-5695 – FLIR AX8 Command Injection Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    How Small Businesses Can Leverage React Native for Big Growth

    Web Development

    8 Comprehensive Open-Source and Hosted Solutions to Seamlessly Convert Any API into AI-Ready MCP Servers

    Machine Learning

    CVE-2025-4756 – D-Link DI-7003GV2 Denial of Service Vulnerability in restart.asp

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    CVE-2023-53132 – “Mellanox MPI3MR Linux Kernel Memory Leak”

    May 2, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2023-53132

    Published : May 2, 2025, 4:15 p.m. | 34 minutes ago

    Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

    scsi: mpi3mr: Fix mpi3mr_hba_port memory leak in mpi3mr_remove()

    Free mpi3mr_hba_port at .remove.

    Severity: 0.0 | NA

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CVE-2025-4487 – iSourcecode Gym Management System SQL Injection Vulnerability

    May 9, 2025

    How to Survive in Tech When Everything’s Changing w/ 21-year Veteran Dev Joe Attardi [Podcast #174]

    May 30, 2025

    Generate videos in Gemini and Whisk with Veo 2

    May 27, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.