Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      The Ultimate Guide to Node.js Development Pricing for Enterprises

      July 29, 2025

      Stack Overflow: Developers’ trust in AI outputs is worsening year over year

      July 29, 2025

      Web Components: Working With Shadow DOM

      July 28, 2025

      Google’s new Opal tool allows users to create mini AI apps with no coding required

      July 28, 2025

      I replaced my Samsung OLED TV with this Sony Mini LED model for a week – and didn’t regret it

      July 29, 2025

      I tested the most popular robot mower on the market – and it was a $5,000 crash out

      July 29, 2025

      5 gadgets and accessories that leveled up my gaming setup (including a surprise console)

      July 29, 2025

      Why I’m patiently waiting for the Samsung Z Fold 8 next year (even though the foldable is already great)

      July 29, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      Performance Analysis with Laravel’s Measurement Tools

      July 29, 2025
      Recent

      Performance Analysis with Laravel’s Measurement Tools

      July 29, 2025

      Memoization and Function Caching with this PHP Package

      July 29, 2025

      Laracon US 2025 Livestream

      July 29, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      Microsoft mysteriously offered a Windows 11 upgrade to this unsupported Windows 10 PC — despite it failing to meet the “non-negotiable” TPM 2.0 requirement

      July 29, 2025
      Recent

      Microsoft mysteriously offered a Windows 11 upgrade to this unsupported Windows 10 PC — despite it failing to meet the “non-negotiable” TPM 2.0 requirement

      July 29, 2025

      With Windows 10’s fast-approaching demise, this Linux migration tool could let you ditch Microsoft’s ecosystem with your data and apps intact — but it’s limited to one distro

      July 29, 2025

      Windows 10 is 10 years old today — let’s look back at 10 controversial and defining moments in its history

      July 29, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Machine Learning»How Much Do Language Models Really Memorize? Meta’s New Framework Defines Model Capacity at the Bit Level

    How Much Do Language Models Really Memorize? Meta’s New Framework Defines Model Capacity at the Bit Level

    June 11, 2025

    Introduction: The Challenge of Memorization in Language Models

    Modern language models face increasing scrutiny regarding their memorization behavior. With models such as an 8-billion parameter transformer trained on 15 trillion tokens, researchers question whether these models memorize their training data in a meaningful way. Common techniques, including data extraction and membership inference, fall short as they often fail to distinguish between memorization and generalization.

    Limitations of Existing Approaches

    Previous frameworks like extraction-based methods or differential privacy operate at the dataset level, not accounting for instance-specific memorization. Language modeling through compression and assessments of capacity through fact memorization (as in RNNs and quantized transformers) offer partial insight but lack scalability and precision, especially for deep transformer architectures.

    A Novel Approach to Measuring Memorization

    Researchers from FAIR at Meta, Google DeepMind, Cornell University, and NVIDIA have proposed a novel method for estimating how much a model “knows” about specific datapoints to measure the capacity of modern language models. They separate memorization into two components: unintended memorization, which represents the information a model contains about a dataset, and generalization, which captures the information about the true data-generation process. They calculate total memorization to provide accurate estimates of model capacity by removing generalization, showing that GPT family models have an approximate capacity of 3.6 bits-per-parameter. Researchers also developed a series of scaling laws that relate model capacity and data size to membership inference by training hundreds of transformer language models.

    Experimental Framework and Training Methodology

    Using the GPT-2 architecture, the team trained hundreds of models ranging from 100K to 20M parameters, varying depths (1-8 layers), and hidden sizes (32-512). Training involved:

    • 10^6 steps
    • Batch size: 2048
    • Precision: bfloat16
    • Hardware: Single A100 GPU

    These models were trained on both synthetic sequences and deduplicated 64-token text sequences from the FineWeb dataset. The experiments ensured minimal interference from generalization through careful dataset construction.

    Model Capacity Insights and Key Findings

    • Bits per parameter: Across configurations, models consistently stored between 3.5 and 3.6 bits/parameter.
    • Double descent: As training dataset size approaches model capacity, test loss initially decreases (overfitting), then improves again as models begin generalizing.
    • Precision impact: Training in float32 increases storage capacity slightly (to ~3.83 bpp) compared to bfloat16 (~3.51 bpp).

    Disentangling Memorization and Generalization

    Switching from synthetic to real-text datasets, the team observed:

    • Sample-level unintended memorization increases with parameter count.
    • Memorization decreases as training set size increases.
    • Accurate estimation of model memorization requires deduplication and reference to an oracle model for baseline compression rates.

    Membership Inference Scaling Laws

    The researchers modeled the success rate (F1 score) of loss-based membership inference as a function of the ratio between model capacity and dataset size. Key observations:

    • Membership inference becomes unreliable as datasets grow.
    • Predictive scaling laws remain accurate within 1-2% for models up to 1.5B parameters.

    Conclusion: A Better Understanding of Model Behavior

    This work establishes a principled framework for measuring memorization in language models. By introducing quantifiable metrics and scalable experiments, it deepens our understanding of how transformer models encode training data and draws a clear boundary between memorization and generalization. The resulting insights can guide future developments in model evaluation, privacy, and interpretability.


    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 99k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.

    ▶ Want to promote your product/webinar/service to 1 Million+ AI Engineers/Developers/Data Scientists/Architects/CTOs/CIOs? Lets Partner..

    The post How Much Do Language Models Really Memorize? Meta’s New Framework Defines Model Capacity at the Bit Level appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleNVIDIA Researchers Introduce Dynamic Memory Sparsification (DMS) for 8× KV Cache Compression in Transformer LLMs
    Next Article Supercharging Workflows with AI Agent and Copilot Development🚀

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    How to Evaluate Jailbreak Methods: A Case Study with the StrongREJECT Benchmark

    July 29, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Amazon Develops an AI Architecture that Cuts Inference Time 30% by Activating Only Relevant Neurons

    July 29, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    CVE-2025-4520 – Uncanny Automator WordPress Unauthorized Data Modification Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    I’ve accepted that Adobe subscriptions are part of my creative life — but with these discounts, it stings much less than it used to

    News & Updates

    CVE-2025-26382 – iSTAR ICU Buffer Overflow

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-5738 – TOTOLINK X15 HTTP POST Request Handler Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-30678 – Trend Micro Apex Central SSRF Vulnerability

    June 17, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-30678

    Published : June 17, 2025, 8:15 p.m. | 15 minutes ago

    Description : A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modTMSM component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.

    Severity: 6.5 | MEDIUM

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    Magnanimous is a simple and fast static website generator

    June 10, 2025

    CVE-2025-27956 – WebLaudos Directory Traversal Information Disclosure

    June 2, 2025

    NVIDIA Open-Sources Open Code Reasoning Models (32B, 14B, 7B)

    May 8, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.